Hershko Dan D, Awad Nibal, Fischer Doron, Mahajna Ahmad, Guralnik Ludmila, Israelit Shlomo H, Krausz Michael M
Department of Surgery A, Rambam Medical Center and the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Aug;50(8):1223-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0272-z.
Focused helical CT using rectal contrast material only has emerged recently as an accurate diagnostic tool for the evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis. This study was designed to prospectively compare the efficacy of rectal contrast CT to other commonly used contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced CT techniques for the detection of acute appendicitis.
A total of 232 patients with clinically suspected appendicitis were randomly assigned to one of three focused helical CT techniques: noncontrast enhanced CT, CT using rectal contrast material only, and dual-contrast CT using both oral and intravenous material. All scans were interpreted by the on-call residents and reported immediately to the surgeon. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and overall accuracy rates were compared between the protocols.
One hundred eleven patients (48 percent) had acute appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity rates of rectal contrast CT were 93 and 95 percent, respectively, with overall accuracy of 94 percent. The sensitivity and specificity rates of dual-contrast CT were 100 and 89 percent, respectively, with overall accuracy of 94 percent. The sensitivity and specificity of noncontrast enhanced CT were 90 and 86 percent, respectively, but the overall accuracy was significantly lower (70 percent) compared with the other studies.
Rectal contrast CT is as accurate, although less sensitive, compared with dual-contrast CT and significantly superior to noncontrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Rectal contrast CT may be performed rapidly, saves resources, and may avoid the diagnostic delay and potential allergic reactions associated with oral and intravenous-enhanced studies, and, therefore, may be the preferred initial technique in the diagnostic workup of suspected acute appendicitis.
仅使用直肠造影剂的聚焦螺旋CT最近已成为评估疑似急性阑尾炎的一种准确诊断工具。本研究旨在前瞻性比较直肠造影CT与其他常用的增强和非增强CT技术在检测急性阑尾炎方面的疗效。
总共232例临床疑似阑尾炎的患者被随机分配到三种聚焦螺旋CT技术之一:非增强CT、仅使用直肠造影剂的CT以及使用口服和静脉造影剂的双对比CT。所有扫描均由值班住院医师解读,并立即报告给外科医生。比较各方案之间的敏感性、特异性、预测值和总体准确率。
111例患者(48%)患有急性阑尾炎。直肠造影CT的敏感性和特异性分别为93%和95%,总体准确率为94%。双对比CT的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和89%,总体准确率为94%。非增强CT的敏感性和特异性分别为90%和86%,但与其他研究相比,总体准确率显著较低(70%)。
与双对比CT相比,直肠造影CT在诊断急性阑尾炎方面同样准确,尽管敏感性较低,且明显优于非增强CT。直肠造影CT可以快速进行,节省资源,并且可以避免与口服和静脉增强研究相关的诊断延迟和潜在过敏反应。因此,在疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断检查中,它可能是首选的初始技术。