Vos Cees J, Verhagen Arianne P, Passchier Jan, Koes Bart W
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Sep;58(554):624-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X330762.
High levels of continuous neck pain after a motor vehicle accident (MVA) are reported in cross-sectional studies. Knowledge of this association in general practice is limited.
To compare the differences in perceived pain and disability in patients with acute neck pain due to an MVA versus other self-reported causes. The secondary aim was to identify prognostic factors for continuous neck pain.
Prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.
General practices in Rotterdam and its suburban region.
Patients with non-specific acute neck pain were invited to participate. Questionnaires were collected at baseline and after 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The numerical pain-rating scale (NRS) and the neck disability index (NDI) were measured. Regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for continuous neck pain.
A total of 187 patients were included. The MVA subgroup (n = 42) was significantly younger (P = 0.007), reported more sick leave (P = 0.037), higher levels of headache (P<0.001) and higher NDI scores at baseline (P = 0.018) but lower scores for previous neck pain (P = 0.015) compared to the remaining cohort. At follow-up the MVA subgroup had higher scores for continuous neck pain (63% versus 40%) and at the NDI (11.0 versus 7.1). After multivariate analysis 'pain in the upper part of the neck' (odds ratio [OR] = 1.6), 'duration of complaints at baseline longer than 2 weeks' (OR = 5.3), and an 'MVA' (OR = 5.3) were significantly correlated with outcome.
Individuals exposed to MVAs constitute a relevant subgroup of patients with neck pain. An MVA and a longer duration of complaints are prognostic factors for continuous neck pain.
横断面研究报告了机动车事故(MVA)后持续高水平的颈部疼痛。在全科医疗中,对这种关联的了解有限。
比较因MVA导致的急性颈部疼痛患者与其他自我报告原因导致的急性颈部疼痛患者在疼痛感知和残疾方面的差异。次要目的是确定持续性颈部疼痛的预后因素。
前瞻性队列研究,随访1年。
鹿特丹及其郊区的全科医疗诊所。
邀请非特异性急性颈部疼痛患者参与。在基线以及6周、12周、26周和52周后收集问卷。测量数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。采用回归分析确定持续性颈部疼痛的预后因素。
共纳入187例患者。与其余队列相比,MVA亚组(n = 42)明显更年轻(P = 0.007),报告病假更多(P = 0.037),头痛水平更高(P<0.001),基线时NDI评分更高(P = 0.018),但既往颈部疼痛评分更低(P = 0.015)。随访时,MVA亚组持续性颈部疼痛评分更高(63%对40%),NDI评分更高(11.0对7.1)。多变量分析后,“颈部上部疼痛”(优势比[OR]=1.6)、“基线时症状持续时间超过2周”(OR = 5.3)和“MVA”(OR = 5.3)与结局显著相关。
遭受MVA的个体是颈部疼痛患者的一个相关亚组。MVA和更长的症状持续时间是持续性颈部疼痛的预后因素。