Scholten-Peeters Gwendolijne G M, Verhagen Arianne P, Bekkering Geertruida E, van der Windt Daniëlle A W M, Barnsley Les, Oostendorp Rob A B, Hendriks Erik J M
Dutch National Institute of Allied Health Professions, P.O. Box 1161, 3800 BD Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Pain. 2003 Jul;104(1-2):303-22. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00050-2.
We present a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Our aim was to assess prognostic factors associated with functional recovery of patients with whiplash injuries. The failure of some patients to recover following whiplash injury has been linked to a number of prognostic factors. However, there is some inconsistency in the literature and there have been no systematic attempts to analyze the level of evidence for prognostic factors in whiplash recovery. Studies were selected for inclusion following a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the database of the Dutch Institute of Allied Health Professions up until April 2002 and hand searches of the reference lists of retrieved articles. Studies were selected if the objective was to assess prognostic factors associated with recovery; the design was a prospective cohort study; the study population included at least an identifiable subgroup of patients suffering from a whiplash injury; and the paper was a full report published in English, German, French or Dutch. The methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. A study was considered to be of 'high quality' if it satisfied at least 50% of the maximum available quality score. Two independent reviewers extracted data and the association between prognostic factors and functional recovery was calculated in terms of risk estimates. Fifty papers reporting on twenty-nine cohorts were included in the review. Twelve cohorts were considered to be of 'high quality'. Because of the heterogeneity of patient selection, type of prognostic factors and outcome measures, no statistical pooling was able to be performed. Strong evidence was found for high initial pain intensity being an adverse prognostic factor. There was strong evidence that for older age, female gender, high acute psychological response, angular deformity of the neck, rear-end collision, and compensation not being associated with an adverse prognosis. Several physical (e.g. restricted range of motion, high number of complaints), psychosocial (previous psychological problems), neuropsychosocial factors (nervousness), crash related (e.g. accident on highway) and treatment related factors (need to resume physiotherapy) showed limited prognostic value for functional recovery. High initial pain intensity is an important predictor for delayed functional recovery for patients with whiplash injury. Often mentioned factors like age, gender and compensation do not seem to be of prognostic value. Scientific information about prognostic factors can guide physicians or other care providers to direct treatment and to probably prevent chronicity.
我们对前瞻性队列研究进行了系统综述。我们的目的是评估与挥鞭伤患者功能恢复相关的预后因素。一些患者在挥鞭伤后未能恢复与多种预后因素有关。然而,文献中存在一些不一致之处,并且尚未有系统的尝试来分析挥鞭伤恢复中预后因素的证据水平。在对MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、荷兰联合健康专业人员研究所数据库进行全面检索直至2002年4月,并对检索到的文章的参考文献列表进行手工检索之后,选择纳入研究。如果研究目的是评估与恢复相关的预后因素;设计为前瞻性队列研究;研究人群至少包括一个可识别的挥鞭伤患者亚组;并且论文是以英文、德文、法文或荷兰文发表的完整报告,则选择该研究。由两名评审员独立评估方法学质量。如果一项研究至少满足最大可用质量评分的50%,则被认为是“高质量”的。两名独立评审员提取数据,并根据风险估计计算预后因素与功能恢复之间的关联。该综述纳入了50篇报告29个队列的论文。12个队列被认为是“高质量”的。由于患者选择、预后因素类型和结局测量的异质性,无法进行统计合并。有强有力的证据表明,初始疼痛强度高是一个不良预后因素。有强有力的证据表明,年龄较大、女性、急性心理反应强烈、颈部角畸形、追尾碰撞以及赔偿与不良预后无关。一些身体因素(如活动范围受限、主诉数量多)、心理社会因素(既往心理问题)、神经心理社会因素(紧张)、事故相关因素(如高速公路上的事故)和治疗相关因素(需要恢复物理治疗)对功能恢复的预后价值有限。初始疼痛强度高是挥鞭伤患者功能恢复延迟的重要预测因素。经常提到的年龄、性别和赔偿等因素似乎没有预后价值。关于预后因素的科学信息可以指导医生或其他护理人员进行针对性治疗,并可能预防慢性病。