Suppr超能文献

异体红细胞输注和涂层体外循环回路对体外循环期间炎症反应的影响:一项随机研究。

The impact of allogenic red cell transfusion and coated bypass circuit on the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized study.

作者信息

Senay Sahin, Toraman Fevzi, Gunaydin Serdar, Kilercik Meltem, Karabulut Hasan, Alhan Cem

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Acibadem Kadikoy Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Jan;8(1):93-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.183608. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study is designed to determine and compare the effects of transfusion and coated circuits on the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

Forty patients were randomized into two groups according to the type of extracorporeal circuit used and later prospectively enrolled into two subgroups according to the need for red cell transfusion during CPB (leading to 4 groups--10 patients per group; group 1: with no transfusion and standard oxygenator, group 2: with transfusion and standard oxygenator, group 3: with no transfusion and coated oxygenator, group 4: with transfusion and coated oxygenator). Serum lactate, interleukin 6, human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), D-dimer and CRP levels were measured at three time points (T1: start of CPB, T2: before removal of aortic cross-clamp, T3: 45 min after the completion of proximal anastomoses). Protein adsorption of oxygenator fibers was measured. Outcome parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

Interleukin 6, TNF-alpha, D-dimer and lactate levels increased at T2 and T3 in all groups (P<0.05 within groups). The increase in interleukin 6 was significant at T2 in group 2 when compared to group 1 (8.0+/-3.9 vs. 4.4+/-1.8, P=0.03). The increase in TNF-alpha was higher at T2 in group 1 when compared to group 3 (16.0+/-4.2 vs. 11.7+/-2.8, P=0.05) and in group 2 when compared to group 3 at T2 and T3 (15.3+/-4.6 vs. 11.7+/-2.8, P=0.06; 17.6+/-5.0 vs. 13.7+/-3.9, P=0.06). Protein adsorption was higher in group 1 and group 2 (group 1 vs. group 3, 2.2+/-0.8 vs. 1.4+/-0.3, P=0.01; group 2 vs. group 3, 2.4+/-0.7 vs. 1.4+/-0.3, P=0.02; group 2 vs. group 4, 2.4+/-0.7 vs. 1.8+/-0.3, P=0.04), it was also higher at group 4 when compared to group 3 (1.8+/-0.3 vs. 1.4+/-0.3, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Allogenic red cell transfusion enhances inflammatory response during CPB; coated circuit systems have a limiting effect on this inflammatory reaction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定并比较输血和涂层回路对体外循环期间炎症反应的影响。

方法

40例患者根据体外循环回路类型随机分为两组,随后根据体外循环期间是否需要输注红细胞前瞻性地分为两个亚组(共4组,每组10例患者;第1组:不输注红细胞且使用标准氧合器,第2组:输注红细胞且使用标准氧合器,第3组:不输注红细胞且使用涂层氧合器,第4组:输注红细胞且使用涂层氧合器)。在三个时间点(T1:体外循环开始时,T2:主动脉阻断钳移除前,T3:近端吻合完成后45分钟)测量血清乳酸、白细胞介素6、人肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、D-二聚体和CRP水平。测量氧合器纤维的蛋白吸附情况。记录结局参数。

结果

所有组在T2和T3时白细胞介素6、TNF-α、D-二聚体和乳酸水平均升高(组内P<0.05)。与第1组相比,第2组在T2时白细胞介素6升高显著(8.0±3.9对4.4±1.8,P=0.03)。与第3组相比,第1组在T2时TNF-α升高更高(16.0±4.2对11.7±2.8,P=0.05),第2组在T2和T3时与第3组相比TNF-α升高更高(15.3±4.6对11.7±2.8,P=0.06;17.6±5.0对13.7±3.9,P=0.06)。第1组和第2组的蛋白吸附更高(第1组对第3组,2.2±0.8对1.4±0.3,P=0.01;第2组对第3组,2.4±0.7对1.4±0.3,P=0.02;第2组对第4组,2.4±0.7对1.8±0.3,P=0.04),第4组与第3组相比蛋白吸附也更高(1.8±0.3对1.4±0.3,P=0.03)。

结论

异体红细胞输血会增强体外循环期间的炎症反应;涂层回路系统对这种炎症反应有抑制作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验