Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu A O, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E
Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
BMJ. 2008 Sep 18;337:a1284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1284.
To assess the relative risk of perinatal mortality, severe preterm delivery, and low birth weight associated with previous treatment for precursors of cervical cancer.
Medline and Embase citation tracking from January 1960 to December 2007. Selection criteria Eligible studies had data on severe pregnancy outcomes for women with and without previous treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Considered outcomes were perinatal mortality, severe preterm delivery (<32/34 weeks), extreme preterm delivery (<28/30 weeks), and low birth weight (<2000 g, <1500 g, and <1000 g). Excisional and ablative treatment procedures were distinguished.
One prospective cohort and 19 retrospective studies were retrieved. Cold knife conisation was associated with a significantly increased risk of perinatal mortality (relative risk 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 5.81) and a significantly higher risk of severe preterm delivery (2.78, 1.72 to 4.51), extreme preterm delivery (5.33, 1.63 to 17.40), and low birth weight of <2000 g (2.86, 1.37 to 5.97). Laser conisation, described in only one study, was also followed by a significantly increased chance of low birth weight of <2000 g and <1500 g. Large loop excision of the transformation zone and ablative treatment with cryotherapy or laser were not associated with a significantly increased risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcomes. Ablation by radical diathermy was associated with a significantly higher frequency of perinatal mortality, severe and extreme preterm delivery, and low birth weight below 2000 g or 1500 g.
In the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cold knife conisation and probably both laser conisation and radical diathermy are associated with an increased risk of subsequent perinatal mortality and other serious pregnancy outcomes, unlike laser ablation and cryotherapy. Large loop excision of the transformation zone cannot be considered as completely free of adverse outcomes.
评估既往宫颈癌前病变治疗与围产期死亡率、严重早产和低出生体重的相对风险。
1960年1月至2007年12月的Medline和Embase引文追踪。选择标准符合条件的研究包含有或无既往宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗史女性的严重妊娠结局数据。纳入的结局指标为围产期死亡率、严重早产(<32/34周)、极早产(<28/30周)和低出生体重(<2000g、<1500g和<1000g)。区分了切除性和消融性治疗程序。
检索到1项前瞻性队列研究和19项回顾性研究。冷刀锥切与围产期死亡率显著增加相关(相对风险2.87,95%置信区间1.42至5.81),严重早产风险显著更高(2.78,1.72至4.51)、极早产风险显著更高(5.33,1.63至17.40)以及<2000g低出生体重风险显著更高(2.86,1.37至5.97)。仅1项研究中描述的激光锥切术后<2000g和<1500g低出生体重的几率也显著增加。转化区大环形切除术以及冷冻疗法或激光消融治疗与严重不良妊娠结局风险显著增加无关。根治性透热消融与围产期死亡率、严重和极早产以及<2000g或<1500g低出生体重的频率显著更高相关。
在宫颈上皮内瘤变的治疗中,与激光消融和冷冻疗法不同,冷刀锥切以及可能的激光锥切和根治性透热消融均与随后的围产期死亡率及其他严重妊娠结局风险增加相关。转化区大环形切除术不能被认为完全没有不良结局。