O'Brien Terence J, Mosewich Russell K, Britton Jeffrey W, Cascino Gregory D, So Elson L
Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Epilepsy Res. 2008 Dec;82(2-3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
This study aimed to determine the reliability of clinical history and seizure semiology for distinguishing between frontal lobe seizures (FLS) and temporal lobe seizures (TLS). FLS patients (n=23) were consecutively identified through an epilepsy surgery database. TLS patients (n=27) were selected randomly from 238 patients who had undergone temporal lobe surgery for epilepsy. The criterion standard for seizure localization was the location of resective epilepsy surgery that controlled seizures for a minimum of 2 years. Blinded comparisons of 13 historical information items (HII) and 19 video-recorded semiologic features (VSF) were made. We identified 3 HII (sex, history of febrile convulsions, and history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures) and 2 VSF (fencing posturing and postictal confusion) that significantly distinguished between FLS and TLS. The multivariate analysis model correctly identified 87% of FLS patients and 74% of TLS patients. No single HII or VSF is sufficient for distinguishing between FLS and TLS. A model integrating multiple HII and VSF may assist in this differentiation, but some patients still may be misclassified.
本研究旨在确定临床病史和癫痫发作症状学对于区分额叶癫痫(FLS)和颞叶癫痫(TLS)的可靠性。通过癫痫手术数据库连续纳入FLS患者(n = 23)。TLS患者(n = 27)从238例因癫痫接受颞叶手术的患者中随机选取。癫痫发作定位的标准是切除性癫痫手术的位置,该手术至少控制癫痫发作2年。对13项历史信息条目(HII)和19项视频记录的症状学特征(VSF)进行了盲法比较。我们确定了3项HII(性别、热性惊厥病史和全面强直阵挛发作病史)和2项VSF(击剑姿势和发作后意识模糊)可显著区分FLS和TLS。多变量分析模型正确识别了87%的FLS患者和74%的TLS患者。没有单一的HII或VSF足以区分FLS和TLS。整合多个HII和VSF的模型可能有助于这种区分,但仍有一些患者可能会被误诊。