• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本严重创伤性脑损伤中 TRISS、CRASH 和 IMPACT 预后模型的外部验证。

External validation of the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Services Management, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221791. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0221791
PMID:31449548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6709937/
Abstract

In Japan, a range of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been recorded in a nationwide database (Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank; JNTDB). This study aimed to externally validate three international prediction models using JNTDB data: Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH), and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT). We also aimed to validate the applicability of these models in the Japanese population. Of 1,091 patients registered in the JNTDB from July 2009 to June 2011, we analyzed data for 635 patients. We examined factors associated with mortality in-hospital and unfavorable outcomes 6 months after TBI by applying the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT models. We also conducted an external validation of these models based on these data. The patients' mean age was 60.1 ±21.1 years, and 342 were alive at the time of discharge (53.9%). Univariate analysis revealed eight major risk factors for mortality in-hospital: age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), systolic blood pressure, heart rate, mydriasis, acute epidural hematoma (AEDH), and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. A similar analysis identified five risk factors for unfavorable outcomes at 6 months: age, GCS, ISS, mydriasis, and AEDH. For mortality in-hospital, the TRISS had a satisfactory area under the curve value (0.75). For unfavorable outcomes at 6 months, the CRASH (basic and computed tomography) and IMPACT (core and core extended) models had satisfactory area under the curve values (0.86, 0.86, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively). The TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT models were suitable for application to the JNTDB population, indicating these models had high value in Japanese patients with neurotrauma.

摘要

在日本,一项全国性数据库(日本神经创伤数据库;JNTDB)记录了一系列创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者。本研究旨在使用 JNTDB 数据对三种国际预测模型(创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)、颅脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机分组(CRASH)和国际创伤后预后和临床试验分析(IMPACT))进行外部验证。我们还旨在验证这些模型在日本人群中的适用性。在 JNTDB 中,2009 年 7 月至 2011 年 6 月期间登记了 1091 名患者,我们分析了其中 635 名患者的数据。我们通过应用 TRISS、CRASH 和 IMPACT 模型,分析了与创伤后住院期间死亡率和 6 个月不良结局相关的因素。我们还根据这些数据对这些模型进行了外部验证。患者的平均年龄为 60.1±21.1 岁,出院时 342 人存活(53.9%)。单因素分析显示,住院期间死亡的 8 个主要危险因素为:年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、收缩压、心率、瞳孔散大、急性硬膜外血肿(AEDH)和创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血。类似的分析确定了 6 个月时不良结局的 5 个危险因素:年龄、GCS、ISS、瞳孔散大和 AEDH。对于住院期间的死亡率,TRISS 的曲线下面积值(0.75)令人满意。对于 6 个月时的不良结局,CRASH(基础和计算机断层扫描)和 IMPACT(核心和核心扩展)模型的曲线下面积值(0.86、0.86、0.81 和 0.85)均令人满意。TRISS、CRASH 和 IMPACT 模型适用于 JNTDB 人群,表明这些模型在日本神经创伤患者中具有很高的价值。

相似文献

1
External validation of the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury in Japan.日本严重创伤性脑损伤中 TRISS、CRASH 和 IMPACT 预后模型的外部验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221791. eCollection 2019.
2
Predicting in-hospital mortality after traumatic brain injury: External validation of CRASH-basic and IMPACT-core in the national trauma data bank.预测创伤性脑损伤后的院内死亡率:CRASH-basic 和 IMPACT-core 在国家创伤数据库中的外部验证。
Injury. 2021 Feb;52(2):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.051. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
3
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.简化创伤性脑损伤预后信息的使用。第 2 部分:概率的图形表示。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1621-1634. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172782. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
4
Prediction of Outcome Based on Trauma and Injury Severity Score, IMPACT and CRASH Prognostic Models in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Elderly.基于创伤和损伤严重程度评分、IMPACT及CRASH预后模型对老年中重度创伤性脑损伤结局的预测
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 Sep 14;16(3):500-506. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_512_20. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
5
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity.简化创伤性脑损伤的预后信息使用。第 1 部分:GCS-瞳孔评分:临床严重程度的扩展指标。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1612-1620. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172780. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
6
Performance of the IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models for traumatic brain injury in a contemporary multicenter cohort: a TRACK-TBI study.当代多中心队列中IMPACT和CRASH创伤性脑损伤预后模型的表现:一项TRACK-TBI研究。
J Neurosurg. 2024 Mar 15;141(2):417-429. doi: 10.3171/2023.11.JNS231425. Print 2024 Aug 1.
7
Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.严重颅脑损伤病例早期死亡率预后评分的验证
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121(6):1314-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Predicted Unfavorable Neurologic Outcome Is Overestimated by the Marshall Computed Tomography Score, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH), and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Models in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Managed with Early Decompressive Craniectomy.在接受早期减压性颅骨切除术治疗的重度创伤性脑损伤患者中,Marshall计算机断层扫描评分、重度颅脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机试验(CRASH)以及创伤性脑损伤临床试验预后与分析国际任务组(IMPACT)模型对不良神经学预后的预测存在高估。
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:554-558. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.051. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.CRASH和IMPACT严重创伤性脑损伤预后模型的外部验证
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jul 1;31(13):1146-52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3003. Epub 2014 May 12.
10
Models of Mortality and Morbidity in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Analysis of a Singapore Neurotrauma Database.严重创伤性脑损伤的死亡率和发病率模型:对新加坡神经创伤数据库的分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:885-893.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.147. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of "Trauma and Injury Severity Scores" and "Madras Head Injury Prognostic Scale" in Assessing Head Trauma Prognosis in the Emergency Department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Sabzevar, Iran.伊朗萨卜泽瓦尔市贝赫什提医院急诊科“创伤和损伤严重程度评分”与“马德拉斯颅脑损伤预后量表”在评估颅脑创伤预后中的比较分析
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2025;13(2):76-82. doi: 10.30476/beat.2025.104632.1554.
2
Results of therapy in children diagnosed with severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患儿的治疗结果。
Neurol Sci. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08191-x.
3
Quality of pediatric trauma care: development of an age-adjusted TRISS model and survival benchmarking in a major trauma center.儿童创伤护理质量:在一家大型创伤中心开发年龄调整后的TRISS模型及生存基准评估
Front Pediatr. 2024 Dec 12;12:1481467. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1481467. eCollection 2024.
4
A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤后意识障碍的Meta分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):290-303. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Settlement Is at the End-Common Trauma Scores Require a Critical Reassessment Due to the Possible Dynamics of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Patients' Clinical Course.由于患者临床病程中创伤性脑损伤可能存在动态变化,结局评估需对常用创伤评分进行批判性重新评估。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 5;13(11):3333. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113333.
6
Comparative analysis of CRASH and IMPACT in predicting the outcome of 340 patients with traumatic brain injury.CRASH与IMPACT对340例创伤性脑损伤患者预后预测的比较分析
Transl Neurosci. 2024 Mar 22;15(1):20220327. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0327. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
7
Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically Ill Adults with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.《成人中重度创伤性脑损伤神经预后指南》。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Apr;40(2):448-476. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01902-2. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
8
Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率风险的预测性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 29;23(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02247-8.
9
Epidemiological characteristics for patients with traumatic brain injury and the nomogram model for poor prognosis: an 18-year hospital-based study.创伤性脑损伤患者的流行病学特征及预后不良的列线图模型:一项基于医院的18年研究
Front Neurol. 2023 May 23;14:1138217. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1138217. eCollection 2023.
10
Prognostic Value of CRASH and IMPACT Models for Predicting Mortality and Unfavorable Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.CRASH和IMPACT模型对预测创伤性脑损伤死亡率和不良结局的预后价值;一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 4;11(1):e27. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1885. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity.简化创伤性脑损伤的预后信息使用。第 1 部分:GCS-瞳孔评分:临床严重程度的扩展指标。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1612-1620. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172780. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Prediction of Poor Prognosis After Severe Head Injury in Children Using Logistic Regression.使用逻辑回归预测儿童重度颅脑损伤后的不良预后
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Dec;34(12):825-831. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001321.
3
Models of Mortality and Morbidity in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Analysis of a Singapore Neurotrauma Database.严重创伤性脑损伤的死亡率和发病率模型:对新加坡神经创伤数据库的分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:885-893.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.147. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Volume replacement during trauma resuscitation: a brief synopsis of current guidelines and recommendations.创伤复苏期间的容量补充:当前指南与建议简述
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug;43(4):439-443. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0771-0. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
5
Comparison of modified Kampala trauma score with trauma mortality prediction model and trauma-injury severity score: A National Trauma Data Bank Study.改良坎帕拉创伤评分与创伤死亡率预测模型及创伤损伤严重程度评分的比较:一项国家创伤数据库研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1056-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.035. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
Controversies in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤管理中的争议
Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Sep;34(3):557-75. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.04.008.
7
External Validation of the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury: Prognostic Models for Traumatic Brain Injury on the Study of the Neuroprotective Activity of Progesterone in Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries Trial.创伤性脑损伤临床试验预后与分析国际任务组的外部验证:重度创伤性脑损伤中孕酮神经保护活性研究的创伤性脑损伤预后模型
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Aug 15;33(16):1535-43. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4164. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
A clinical trial of progesterone for severe traumatic brain injury.一项关于孕激素治疗严重创伤性脑损伤的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 25;371(26):2467-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411090. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
9
[Modified McPeek score in multiple trauma patients. Prospective evaluation of a points system for recording follow-up factors].[多发伤患者的改良麦克皮克评分。记录随访因素的评分系统的前瞻性评估]
Anaesthesist. 2014 May;63(5):387-93. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2315-x. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
10
Outcomes of traumatic brain injury in Hong Kong: validation with the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT models.香港创伤性脑损伤的结局:TRISS、CRASH 和 IMPACT 模型的验证。
J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Dec;20(12):1693-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Aug 28.