Suppr超能文献

预测重症监护病房收治后心脏手术患者的预后。

Predicting outcomes for cardiac surgery patients after intensive care unit admission.

作者信息

Kramer Andrew A, Zimmerman Jack E

机构信息

Cerner Corporation, Vienna, Virginia 22182, USA.

出版信息

Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Sep;12(3):175-83. doi: 10.1177/1089253208323413.

Abstract

Most performance assessments of cardiac surgery programs use models based on preoperative risk factors. Models that were primarily developed to assess performance in general intensive care unit (ICU) populations have also been used to evaluate the quality of surgical, anesthetic, and ICU management after cardiac surgery. Although there are currently 5 models for evaluating general ICU populations, only the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) system has been independently validated for cardiac surgery patients. This review describes the evolution, rationale, and accuracy of APACHE models that are specific for cardiac surgery patients as well as for patients who have had vascular and thoracic procedures. In addition to performance comparisons based on observed and predicted mortality, APACHE provides similar comparisons of ICU and hospital lengths of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. However, the low mortality incidence of many cardiac outcomes means that very large numbers of patients must be obtained to get good predictive models. Thus, the equations are not designed for predicting individual patients' outcome but have proven useful in performance comparisons and for quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

大多数心脏外科手术项目的绩效评估使用基于术前风险因素的模型。最初用于评估普通重症监护病房(ICU)患者表现的模型,也被用于评估心脏手术后外科、麻醉和ICU管理的质量。尽管目前有5种用于评估普通ICU患者的模型,但只有急性生理与慢性健康评估(APACHE)系统已针对心脏手术患者进行了独立验证。本综述描述了专门针对心脏手术患者以及接受血管和胸科手术患者的APACHE模型的演变、原理和准确性。除了基于观察到的和预测的死亡率进行绩效比较外,APACHE还提供了ICU住院时间、医院住院时间和机械通气持续时间的类似比较。然而,许多心脏手术结果的低死亡率意味着必须获取大量患者才能得到良好的预测模型。因此,这些方程并非用于预测个体患者的预后,但已被证明在绩效比较和质量改进举措中很有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验