• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项对喷砂酸蚀种植体的回顾性分析,其愈合时间缩短,观察期长达5年。

A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years.

作者信息

Nelson Katja, Semper Wiebke, Hildebrand Detlef, Ozyuvaci Hakan

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Campus Virchow Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):726-32.

PMID:18807571
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of 2 different implant systems with sandblasted and acid-etched modified surfaces loaded after reduced healing periods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred seventeen patients with a mean observation period of 3.75 years (24 to 61 months) were included in this evaluation. Chart reviews of a standardized recall program were evaluated. All 532 placed implants showed an unloaded healing time of 6 weeks in the mandible and 12 weeks in the maxilla. At abutment placement a torque value of 35 Ncm was one of the primary variables, and the success of the implants over time was determined by the criteria of Buser et al. The survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, and the probability of an event within 1 group independent of time was evaluated using the chi-square test and Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Of the 532 implants, 235 were placed in female and 297 in male patients; 448 implants were located in the maxilla and 84 in the mandible. Three implants were lost prior to abutment connection in 3 patients. Life table analyses show an overall success rate of 99.4% at 5 years, as no implants were lost after abutment connection. There was no significant association of the implant type (P = .185), gender (P = .99), or jaw (maxilla/mandible; P = .06) and the survival of the implants within this study.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data found in this investigation, it can be concluded that implants with sandblasted, acid-etched surfaces can be restored after a 6- to 12-week healing period with a high predictability of success.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估两种具有喷砂和酸蚀改性表面的不同种植系统在缩短愈合期后加载时的成功率。

材料与方法

本评估纳入了117例患者,平均观察期为3.75年(24至61个月)。对标准化召回程序的病历进行了评估。所有532颗植入的种植体在下颌骨的无负载愈合时间为6周,在上颌骨为12周。在基台安置时,35 Ncm的扭矩值是主要变量之一,种植体随时间的成功情况由Buser等人的标准确定。使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析生存率,并使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验评估一组内与时间无关的事件概率。

结果

在532颗种植体中,235颗植入女性患者,297颗植入男性患者;448颗种植体位于上颌骨,84颗位于下颌骨。3例患者在基台连接前有3颗种植体丢失。生命表分析显示,5年时的总体成功率为99.4%,因为基台连接后没有种植体丢失。在本研究中,种植体类型(P = 0.185)、性别(P = 0.99)或颌骨(上颌骨/下颌骨;P = 0.06)与种植体的生存率之间没有显著关联。

结论

根据本研究中的数据,可以得出结论,具有喷砂、酸蚀表面的种植体在6至12周的愈合期后可以进行修复,成功率具有较高的可预测性。

相似文献

1
A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years.一项对喷砂酸蚀种植体的回顾性分析,其愈合时间缩短,观察期长达5年。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):726-32.
2
Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: two-year results of a prospective two-center study.非潜入式钛种植体表面经化学改良喷砂酸蚀处理后 21 天愈合期内进行即刻负载:一项前瞻性双中心研究的两年结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00204.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
3
Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.802颗采用新型喷砂和酸蚀表面的两段式潜入式即刻负重种植体的临床结果:12个月随访
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):763-8.
4
Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface.体内对具有喷砂和酸蚀表面的种植体进行种植体稳定性的共振频率测量。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):641-51.
5
Survival and success of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a retrospective study.喷砂、大颗粒、酸蚀和钛等离子喷涂种植体的存活率与成功率:一项回顾性研究。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2007 Nov;73(9):821.
6
Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.831 例连续植入人体的氧化锆牙种植体 5 年成功率:三种不同粗糙表面的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):336-44.
7
Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons.1个月和2个月愈合期后植入的双重蚀刻种植体:狒狒的组织学比较
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Aug;22(4):399-407.
8
Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing.愈合期间延迟加载和即刻加载种植体的种植体稳定性测量
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):529-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x.
9
Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants.使用具有颗粒喷砂和酸蚀微结构表面的Camlog螺旋圆柱种植体进行口腔修复。一项特别考虑短种植体的前瞻性研究结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):591-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01375.x. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
10
Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.分期式上颌窦底提升术后牙种植体的性能:部分牙列缺损患者前瞻性研究的5年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):1034-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01573.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year follow-up.日常牙科实践中采用内锥形连接的种植体修复体的临床和患者报告结局:长达7年随访的前瞻性观察性多中心试验
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Apr 8;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00211-z.
2
Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments.日常牙科实践中种植体的成功率和留存率:一项使用CAMLOG SCREW-LINE种植体(有无平台转换基台)的非干预性研究的5年结果
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Nov 2;4(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0145-3.
3
Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading.
种植体复合体的连接设计和钛等级对静态载荷下抗力的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):388-395. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.388. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
4
Frequency of Dental Implants Placed in the Esthetic Zone in Dental Clinic of Tehran University: A Descriptive Study.德黑兰大学牙科诊所美学区种植牙植入频率:一项描述性研究。
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Dec;12(12):906-12.
5
Comparison of the reproducibility of results of a new peri-implantitis assessment system (implant success index) with the Misch classification.一种新型种植体周围炎评估系统(种植体成功指数)与米施分类法结果可重复性的比较。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;40(2):61-7. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.61. Epub 2014 Apr 28.