• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

831 例连续植入人体的氧化锆牙种植体 5 年成功率:三种不同粗糙表面的比较。

Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.

机构信息

University of Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):336-44.

PMID:20369093
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year success rate of zirconia (ZrO2) implants with three different kinds of surfaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-piece zirconia dental implants (CeraRoot) with three different roughened surfaces were designed and manufactured for this study: coated, uncoated, and acid-etched. Five different implant designs were manufactured. Standard or flapless surgical procedures were used for implant placement. Simultaneous bone augmentation or sinus elevation was performed when bone height or width was insufficient. Definitive all-ceramic restorations were placed 4 months after implant placement (8 months or more for implants when bone augmentation or sinus elevation was performed). The implants were followed up to 5 years (mean, 3.40 +/- 0.21).

RESULTS

In all, 831 implants were placed in 378 patients with a mean age of 48 years. The overall implant success rate after 5 years of follow-up was 95% (92.77% for uncoated implants, 93.57% for coated implants, and 97.60% for acid-etched implants). The success rate of the acid-etched surface group was significantly better than that of the other two.

CONCLUSION

From this midterm investigation, it can be concluded that zirconia dental implants with roughened surfaces might be a viable alternative for tooth replacement. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term success rates of the implant surfaces studied.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估三种不同表面处理的氧化锆(ZrO2)种植体的 5 年成功率。

材料和方法

本研究设计并制造了三种不同表面粗糙度的一体式氧化锆牙科种植体(CeraRoot):涂层、未涂层和酸蚀。制造了五种不同的种植体设计。标准或无瓣手术程序用于植入物的放置。当骨高度或宽度不足时,同时进行骨增量或窦提升。植入物放置 4 个月后(当进行骨增量或窦提升时,植入物放置 8 个月或更长时间)进行最终的全陶瓷修复。对这些植入物进行了长达 5 年的随访(平均 3.40 +/- 0.21)。

结果

总共在 378 名平均年龄为 48 岁的患者中放置了 831 个种植体。5 年随访后,总体种植体成功率为 95%(未涂层种植体为 92.77%,涂层种植体为 93.57%,酸蚀种植体为 97.60%)。酸蚀表面组的成功率明显优于其他两组。

结论

从这项中期研究可以得出结论,表面粗糙的氧化锆牙科种植体可能是替代牙齿的可行选择。需要进一步的随访来评估所研究的种植体表面的长期成功率。

相似文献

1
Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.831 例连续植入人体的氧化锆牙种植体 5 年成功率:三种不同粗糙表面的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):336-44.
2
One-year follow-up of first consecutive 100 zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of 2 different rough surfaces.人类首批连续100颗氧化锆牙种植体的一年随访:两种不同粗糙表面的比较
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):430-5.
3
Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.上颌窦提升术后种植体存留情况的长期评估:病例系列研究
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Apr;28(2):163-9.
4
Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: two-year results of a prospective two-center study.非潜入式钛种植体表面经化学改良喷砂酸蚀处理后 21 天愈合期内进行即刻负载:一项前瞻性双中心研究的两年结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00204.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
5
Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.分期式上颌窦底提升术后牙种植体的性能:部分牙列缺损患者前瞻性研究的5年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):1034-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01573.x.
6
A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.一项对使用Le Fort I型截骨术和植入骨移植重建严重吸收的上颌骨后植入的两种不同种植体表面进行的长期回顾性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):911-8.
7
Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.采用经化学改良的喷砂酸蚀表面的非潜入式钛种植体早期负荷:一项聚焦于种植体周骨变化和种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)值的下颌后牙区前瞻性病例系列研究的 6 个月结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
8
Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: a 12-year life-table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants.牙种植体植入联合骨凿上颌窦底提升术:一项对588颗ITI种植体的前瞻性研究的12年生命表分析
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Apr;17(2):194-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01192.x.
9
Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implants placed into single-rooted extraction sockets: 2-year follow-up of a clinical study.即刻、非潜入式、根向模拟氧化锆种植体植入单根拔牙窝:一项临床研究的 2 年随访。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;38(11):1127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
10
Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.不同表面纹理的氧化锆种植体与钛种植体在上颌微型猪中的生物力学和组织形态计量学比较
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):662-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01401.x. Epub 2007 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氧化锆种植体的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 23;28(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05401-8.
2
Long-Term Stability of Hydrothermally Aged and/or Dynamically Loaded One-Piece Diameter Reduced Zirconia Oral Implants.水热老化和/或动态加载的一体式直径减小氧化锆口腔种植体的长期稳定性
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Feb 24;14(3):123. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030123.
3
Effect of Sintering Temperature on Flexural Strength of Two Types of Zirconia.烧结温度对两种氧化锆抗弯强度的影响
Front Dent. 2022 Sep 12;19:31. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i31.10803. eCollection 2022.
4
In Vitro Investigation of Material Combinations for Meso- and Suprastructures in a Biomimetic Approach to Restore One-Piece Zirconia Implants.用于修复一体式氧化锆种植体的仿生方法中,中观和超结构材料组合的体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 5;16(4):1355. doi: 10.3390/ma16041355.
5
How Navigate the Map: The Effect of Surface Topography on the Adhesion of on Biomaterials.如何导航地图:表面形貌对生物材料上细胞黏附的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 18;15(14):4988. doi: 10.3390/ma15144988.
6
Clinical Performance Comparing Titanium and Titanium-Zirconium or Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.钛及钛锆或氧化锆牙科种植体的临床性能比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 12;10(5):83. doi: 10.3390/dj10050083.
7
Advancing dental implants: Bioactive and therapeutic modifications of zirconia.先进的牙科植入物:氧化锆的生物活性和治疗性改性
Bioact Mater. 2021 Nov 5;13:161-178. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.010. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Classification and Properties of Dental Zirconia as Implant Fixtures and Superstructures.牙科氧化锆作为种植体和上部结构的分类及特性
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;14(17):4879. doi: 10.3390/ma14174879.
9
A Special Design to Facilitate Retrieval of Cement-Retained Zirconia-Based Implant-Supported Restorations.一种便于取出骨水泥固位的氧化锆基种植体支持修复体的特殊设计。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Jun;22(2):132-137. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.85080.1114.
10
Osseointegration of a novel injection molded 2-piece ceramic dental implant: a study in minipigs.新型注塑 2 件式陶瓷牙种植体的骨整合:小型猪研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Feb;25(2):603-615. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03513-z. Epub 2020 Sep 10.