Suppr超能文献

安大略省和艾伯塔省生食喂养的治疗犬排出沙门氏菌及其他潜在病原体的风险评估。

Evaluation of the risks of shedding Salmonellae and other potential pathogens by therapy dogs fed raw diets in Ontario and Alberta.

作者信息

Lefebvre S L, Reid-Smith R, Boerlin P, Weese J S

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Zoonoses Public Health. 2008 Oct;55(8-10):470-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01145.x.

Abstract

Dogs that participate in animal-assisted interventions (AAIs), often called 'therapy dogs', commonly interact with humans whose immune systems are not functioning optimally. The advisability of feeding raw meat (including poultry) to these animals remains a highly contentious issue, in spite of increasing evidence that raw meat is frequently contaminated with Salmonella. We set out to determine if consuming raw meat influences the risk of therapy dogs shedding Salmonella and other pathogens. Two hundred healthy therapy dogs from Ontario and Alberta were enrolled. Between May 2005 and November 2006, fecal specimens were collected from each dog every 2 months for 1 year, along with a log of places visited, antimicrobial use within the home, dog health status and diet. Specimens were cultured for Salmonella, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), extended-spectrum cephalosporinase (ESC) Escherichia coli and Clostridium difficile. Forty (20%) of the dogs were reported to have been fed raw meat at some point during the year. The incidence rate of Salmonella shedding in the raw meat-fed dogs was 0.61 cases/dog-year, compared with 0.08 cases/dog-year in dogs that were not fed raw meat (P<0.001). Controlling for therapy dog group, the repeated measures, and pig ear consumption and diarrhoea in the 2 months prior to specimen submission, dogs that consumed raw meat were significantly more likely to test positive for Salmonella at least once during the year than dogs that did not eat raw meat [odds ratio (OR) 22.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-58.8; P<0.001]. Specific Salmonella serovars were more common among dogs that consumed raw meat versus those that did not include S. Typhimurium, S. Heidelberg and S. Kentucky. Raw meat consumption was also significantly associated with shedding ESC E. coli (OR 17.2; 95% CI 9.4-32.3). No associations between C. difficile, MRSA or VRE and consumption of raw meat were detected. We recommend that dogs fed raw meat should be excluded from AAI programmes, particularly when the programmes involve interaction with humans at high risk of infection or adverse sequelae attributable to infection. Furthermore, although AAI dogs may not be representative of the general population of dogs, we also recommend that feeding of raw meat to dogs is to be avoided in homes where immunocompromised people live.

摘要

参与动物辅助干预(AAIs)的犬只,通常被称为“治疗犬”,它们经常与免疫系统功能并非最佳的人类互动。尽管越来越多的证据表明生肉经常被沙门氏菌污染,但给这些动物喂食生肉(包括家禽肉)是否明智仍是一个极具争议的问题。我们着手确定食用生肉是否会影响治疗犬排出沙门氏菌和其他病原体的风险。招募了来自安大略省和艾伯塔省的200只健康治疗犬。在2005年5月至2006年11月期间,对每只犬每2个月采集一次粪便标本,持续1年,同时记录其去过的地方、家中抗菌药物的使用情况、犬的健康状况和饮食情况。对标本进行沙门氏菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)、超广谱头孢菌素酶(ESC)大肠杆菌和艰难梭菌的培养。据报告,有40只(20%)犬在这一年中的某个时间点被喂食过生肉。喂食生肉的犬只沙门氏菌排出率为0.61例/犬年,而未喂食生肉的犬只沙门氏菌排出率为0.08例/犬年(P<0.001)。在控制治疗犬组、重复测量以及标本提交前2个月内猪耳朵的食用情况和腹泻情况后,食用生肉的犬只在这一年中至少有一次沙门氏菌检测呈阳性的可能性显著高于未食用生肉的犬只[比值比(OR)22.7;95%置信区间(CI)3.1 - 58.8;P<0.001]。在食用生肉的犬只中,特定的沙门氏菌血清型比未食用生肉的犬只中更常见,包括鼠伤寒沙门氏菌、海德堡沙门氏菌和肯塔基沙门氏菌。食用生肉还与排出ESC大肠杆菌显著相关(OR 17.2;95% CI 9.4 - 32.3)。未检测到艰难梭菌、MRSA或VRE与食用生肉之间的关联。我们建议,喂食生肉的犬只应被排除在动物辅助干预项目之外,特别是当这些项目涉及与有感染高风险或因感染导致不良后果风险的人类互动时。此外,尽管动物辅助干预犬可能不代表犬的总体群体,但我们也建议在有免疫功能低下人群居住的家庭中避免给犬喂食生肉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验