• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与动物辅助干预的犬类获得耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、艰难梭菌及其他医疗保健相关病原体的发生率。

Incidence of acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile, and other health-care-associated pathogens by dogs that participate in animal-assisted interventions.

作者信息

Lefebvre Sandra L, Reid-Smith Richard J, Waltner-Toews David, Weese J Scott

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Jun 1;234(11):1404-17. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.11.1404.

DOI:10.2460/javma.234.11.1404
PMID:19480620
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether dogs that visited human health-care facilities were at greater risk of acquiring certain health-care-associated pathogens, compared with dogs performing animal-assisted interventions in other settings, and to identify specific behaviors of dogs associated with an increased risk of acquiring these pathogens.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort and nested case-control studies.

ANIMALS

96 dogs that visited human health-care facilities and 98 dogs involved in other animal-assisted interventions.

PROCEDURES

Fecal samples and nasal swab specimens were collected from dogs at the time of recruitment and every 2 months for 1 year and were tested for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Clostridium difficile, and other selected bacteria. Information was also obtained on facilities visited during animal-assisted interventions, dog diet, dog illnesses, and antimicrobial use within the home. At the end of the study, dog handlers were asked about the behavior of their dogs during visits to health-care facilities.

RESULTS

Rates of acquisition of MRSA and C difficile were 4.7 and 2.4 times as high, respectively, among dogs that visited human health-care facilities, compared with rates among dogs involved in other animal-assisted interventions. Among dogs that visited human health-care facilities, those that licked patients or accepted treats during visits were more likely to be positive for MRSA and C difficile than were dogs that did not lick patients or accept treats.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggested that dogs that visited human health-care facilities were at risk of acquiring MRSA and C difficile, particularly when they licked patients or accepted treats during visits.

摘要

目的

确定与在其他环境中进行动物辅助干预的犬相比,前往人类医疗保健机构的犬感染某些医疗保健相关病原体的风险是否更高,并确定与感染这些病原体风险增加相关的犬的特定行为。

设计

前瞻性队列研究和巢式病例对照研究。

动物

96只前往人类医疗保健机构的犬和98只参与其他动物辅助干预的犬。

程序

在招募时以及之后的1年中每2个月从犬采集粪便样本和鼻拭子标本,检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、艰难梭菌和其他选定细菌。还获取了有关动物辅助干预期间所到访机构、犬的饮食、犬的疾病以及家庭中抗菌药物使用情况的信息。在研究结束时,询问犬主人其犬在前往医疗保健机构期间的行为。

结果

与参与其他动物辅助干预的犬相比,前往人类医疗保健机构的犬感染MRSA和艰难梭菌的发生率分别高出4.7倍和2.4倍。在前往人类医疗保健机构的犬中,在就诊期间舔患者或接受食物的犬比不舔患者或不接受食物的犬感染MRSA和艰难梭菌呈阳性的可能性更高。

结论及临床意义

结果表明,前往人类医疗保健机构的犬有感染MRSA和艰难梭菌的风险,尤其是在它们在就诊期间舔患者或接受食物时。

相似文献

1
Incidence of acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile, and other health-care-associated pathogens by dogs that participate in animal-assisted interventions.参与动物辅助干预的犬类获得耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、艰难梭菌及其他医疗保健相关病原体的发生率。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Jun 1;234(11):1404-17. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.11.1404.
2
Evaluation of the risks of shedding Salmonellae and other potential pathogens by therapy dogs fed raw diets in Ontario and Alberta.安大略省和艾伯塔省生食喂养的治疗犬排出沙门氏菌及其他潜在病原体的风险评估。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2008 Oct;55(8-10):470-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01145.x.
3
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in resident animals of a long-term care facility.长期护理机构居民动物中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 May;57(3):220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01302.x. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
4
Contamination of pet therapy dogs with MRSA and Clostridium difficile.宠物治疗犬被耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和艰难梭菌污染。
J Hosp Infect. 2009 Jul;72(3):268-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.02.019. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
5
An investigation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in people and pets in the same household with an infected person or infected pet.对与感染者或感染宠物同处一个家庭的人和宠物中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌定植情况的调查。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Sep 1;235(5):540-3. doi: 10.2460/javma.235.5.540.
6
Prevalence and risk factors for Clostridium difficile colonization in dogs and cats hospitalized in an intensive care unit.重症监护病房住院犬猫艰难梭菌定植的患病率及危险因素
Vet Microbiol. 2008 May 25;129(1-2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.11.013. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
7
Sustained reduction in antimicrobial use and decrease in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile infections following implementation of an electronic medical record at a tertiary-care teaching hospital.在一家三级教学医院实施电子病历后,抗菌药物的使用持续减少,耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和艰难梭菌感染减少。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Jan;66(1):205-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq404. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
8
Engaging patients in the prevention of health care-associated infections: a survey of patients' awareness, knowledge, and perceptions regarding the risks and consequences of infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile.让患者参与预防医源性感染:一项调查患者对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和艰难梭菌感染的风险和后果的认识、知识和看法。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Apr;41(4):322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.334. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
9
Lack of transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) between apparently healthy dogs in a rescue kennel.在一个救援收容所中,显然健康的狗之间未发生耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的传播。
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Feb 24;141(1-2):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
10
National point prevalence of Clostridium difficile in US health care facility inpatients, 2008.2008年美国医疗机构住院患者中艰难梭菌的全国现患率。
Am J Infect Control. 2009 May;37(4):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04089-3.
2
Community-Acquired Infection: The Fox Among the Chickens.社区获得性感染:鸡群中的狐狸
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 14;26(10):4716. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104716.
3
Developing and Planning a Protocol for Implementing Health Promoting Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) in a Tertiary Health Setting.制定和规划一项在三级医疗机构中实施促进健康的动物辅助干预(AAI)的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 18;20(18):6780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186780.
4
One Health Approach for Reporting Veterinary Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales and Other Bacteria of Public Health Concern.One Health 方法用于报告兽医碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科和其他公共卫生关注细菌。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2023 Jun;29(6):1-9. doi: 10.3201/eid2906.221648.
5
Infrequent intrahousehold transmission of Clostridioides difficile between pet owners and their pets.宠物主人与其宠物之间难辨梭状芽孢杆菌的偶发家庭内传播。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2023 Jun;70(4):341-351. doi: 10.1111/zph.13032. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
6
Isolation, molecular typing and antimicrobial resistance of in dogs and cats in Lanzhou city of Northwest China.中国西北兰州市犬猫体内[具体物质未给出,原文不完整]的分离、分子分型及抗菌药物耐药性研究
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 18;9:1032945. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1032945. eCollection 2022.
7
Race, Zoonoses and Animal Assisted Interventions in Pediatric Cancer.种族、人畜共患病与儿科癌症的动物辅助干预
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;19(13):7772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137772.
8
Canine-Assisted Interventions and the Relevance of Welfare Assessments for Human Health, and Transmission of Zoonosis: A Literature Review.犬辅助干预与福利评估对人类健康的相关性及人畜共患病传播:文献综述
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jun 17;9:899889. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.899889. eCollection 2022.
9
Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks.医院动物辅助干预项目中关键工作者利益相关者群体对职业益处和感知风险的认知与实践
People Anim. 2022;5(1).
10
Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing and Carbapenem-Resistant in Companion and Animal-Assisted Interventions Dogs.在伴侣动物和动物辅助干预犬中,产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶和耐碳青霉烯类的
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12952. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412952.