Lefebvre Sandra L, Reid-Smith Richard J, Waltner-Toews David, Weese J Scott
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Jun 1;234(11):1404-17. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.11.1404.
To determine whether dogs that visited human health-care facilities were at greater risk of acquiring certain health-care-associated pathogens, compared with dogs performing animal-assisted interventions in other settings, and to identify specific behaviors of dogs associated with an increased risk of acquiring these pathogens.
Prospective cohort and nested case-control studies.
96 dogs that visited human health-care facilities and 98 dogs involved in other animal-assisted interventions.
Fecal samples and nasal swab specimens were collected from dogs at the time of recruitment and every 2 months for 1 year and were tested for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Clostridium difficile, and other selected bacteria. Information was also obtained on facilities visited during animal-assisted interventions, dog diet, dog illnesses, and antimicrobial use within the home. At the end of the study, dog handlers were asked about the behavior of their dogs during visits to health-care facilities.
Rates of acquisition of MRSA and C difficile were 4.7 and 2.4 times as high, respectively, among dogs that visited human health-care facilities, compared with rates among dogs involved in other animal-assisted interventions. Among dogs that visited human health-care facilities, those that licked patients or accepted treats during visits were more likely to be positive for MRSA and C difficile than were dogs that did not lick patients or accept treats.
Results suggested that dogs that visited human health-care facilities were at risk of acquiring MRSA and C difficile, particularly when they licked patients or accepted treats during visits.
确定与在其他环境中进行动物辅助干预的犬相比,前往人类医疗保健机构的犬感染某些医疗保健相关病原体的风险是否更高,并确定与感染这些病原体风险增加相关的犬的特定行为。
前瞻性队列研究和巢式病例对照研究。
96只前往人类医疗保健机构的犬和98只参与其他动物辅助干预的犬。
在招募时以及之后的1年中每2个月从犬采集粪便样本和鼻拭子标本,检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、艰难梭菌和其他选定细菌。还获取了有关动物辅助干预期间所到访机构、犬的饮食、犬的疾病以及家庭中抗菌药物使用情况的信息。在研究结束时,询问犬主人其犬在前往医疗保健机构期间的行为。
与参与其他动物辅助干预的犬相比,前往人类医疗保健机构的犬感染MRSA和艰难梭菌的发生率分别高出4.7倍和2.4倍。在前往人类医疗保健机构的犬中,在就诊期间舔患者或接受食物的犬比不舔患者或不接受食物的犬感染MRSA和艰难梭菌呈阳性的可能性更高。
结果表明,前往人类医疗保健机构的犬有感染MRSA和艰难梭菌的风险,尤其是在它们在就诊期间舔患者或接受食物时。