Woodbury Michelle L, Howland Dena R, McGuirk Theresa E, Davis Sandra B, Senesac Claudia R, Kautz Steve, Richards Lorie G
Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):78-91. doi: 10.1177/1545968308318836. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
Poststroke reaching is characterized by excessive trunk motion and abnormal shoulder-elbow coordination. Little attention is typically given to arm-trunk kinematics during task practice. Preventing compensatory trunk motion during short-term practice immediately improves kinematics, but effects of longer-term practice are unknown.
This study compared the effects of intensive task practice with and without trunk restraint on poststroke reaching kinematics and function.
A total of 11 individuals with chronic stroke, baseline Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment scores 26 to 54, were randomized to 2 constraint-therapy intervention groups. All participants wore a mitt on the unaffected hand for 90% of waking hours over 14 days and participated in 10 days/6 hours/day of supervised progressive task practice. During supervised sessions, one group trained with a trunk restraint (preventing anterior trunk motion) and one group did not. Tasks for the trunk-restraint group were located to afford repeated use of a shoulder flexion-elbow extension reaching pattern. Outcome measures included kinematics of unrestrained targeted reaching and tests of functional arm ability.
Posttraining, the trunk-restraint group demonstrated straighter reach trajectories (P=.000) and less trunk displacement (P=.001). The trunk-restraint group gained shoulder flexion (P=.006) and elbow extension (P=.022) voluntary ranges of motion, the nonrestraint group did not. Posttraining angle-angle plots illustrated that individuals from the trunk-restraint group transitioned from elbow flexion to elbow extension during mid-reach; individuals in the nonrestraint group retained pretraining movement strategies. Both groups gained functional arm ability (P<.05 all tests).
Intensive task practice structured to prevent compensatory trunk movements and promote shoulder flexion-elbow extension coordination may reinforce development of "normal" reaching kinematics.
中风后上肢伸展的特点是躯干运动过度和肩肘协调性异常。在任务练习期间,人们通常很少关注手臂与躯干的运动学。在短期练习中防止代偿性躯干运动可立即改善运动学,但长期练习的效果尚不清楚。
本研究比较了有躯干约束和无躯干约束的强化任务练习对中风后上肢伸展运动学和功能的影响。
共有11例慢性中风患者,基线Fugl-Meyer上肢评估得分在26至54分之间,被随机分为2个约束治疗干预组。所有参与者在14天内清醒时间的90%将健侧手戴上手套,并参加每天10天、每次6小时的监督下的渐进式任务练习。在监督练习期间,一组使用躯干约束(防止躯干向前运动)进行训练,另一组不使用。躯干约束组的任务设置旨在反复使用肩屈曲-肘伸展的伸展模式。结果测量包括无约束目标伸展的运动学和功能性手臂能力测试。
训练后,躯干约束组的伸展轨迹更直(P = 0.000),躯干位移更小(P = 0.001)。躯干约束组获得了肩屈曲(P = 0.006)和肘伸展(P = 0.022)的自愿运动范围,无约束组则没有。训练后的角度-角度图表明,躯干约束组的个体在伸展中期从肘屈曲过渡到肘伸展;无约束组的个体保留了训练前的运动策略。两组的功能性手臂能力均有所提高(所有测试P < 0.05)。
旨在防止代偿性躯干运动并促进肩屈曲-肘伸展协调的强化任务练习可能会加强“正常”伸展运动学的发展。