Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(3):247-55. doi: 10.1177/1545968311415862. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
Constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is effective in improving upper extremity motor function, but evidence is lacking about effectiveness grasp and trunk control.
This study investigated whether distributed CIT combined with trunk restraint (dCIT + TR) benefited movement kinematics of grasping and the trunk, as well as motor ability of the upper extremity, more than dCIT alone.
A total of 45 stroke participants received 2 hours of dCIT + TR, dCIT, or the dose-matched control intervention for 3 weeks. Movement kinematics, motor ability, and daily function were the outcome measures. Movement kinematics included grasping, joint range, and trunk movement at various phases of reach-to-grasp tasks. Motor ability and daily function of all participants were evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Activity Log.
Four to 5 participants in each group were not included for kinematic analysis because of their inability to grasp a can. The dCIT + TR group showed better preplanned grasping movement and less trunk motion at the early phase of the reach-to-grasp movements than the dCIT or control groups. Compared with the controls, the dCIT + TR participants showed better motor ability in the overall and distal arm scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. The dCIT + TR and dCIT participants demonstrated significantly greater functional use of the affected arm.
Administering dCIT + TR produced additional benefits by improving grasping control and reversing the compensatory trunk movement at the early phase of a reach-to-grasp movement. The use of experimental tasks beyond and within arm's length might improve our understanding of optimal upper extremity rehabilitation.
约束诱导疗法(CIT)在改善上肢运动功能方面是有效的,但缺乏关于抓握和躯干控制效果的证据。
本研究旨在探讨分布式 CIT 联合躯干约束(dCIT + TR)是否比单独使用 dCIT 更有利于改善抓握运动的运动学以及躯干和上肢的运动能力。
共有 45 名卒中患者接受 2 小时的 dCIT + TR、dCIT 或剂量匹配的对照干预治疗,为期 3 周。运动学、运动能力和日常生活能力是主要观察指标。运动学包括抓握、关节活动度和伸手抓握任务各阶段的躯干运动。所有参与者的运动能力和日常生活能力均使用 Fugl-Meyer 评估和运动活动日志进行评估。
由于无法抓取罐子,每组有 4 至 5 名参与者未纳入运动学分析。与 dCIT 或对照组相比,dCIT + TR 组在伸手抓握任务的早期阶段表现出更好的预计划抓握运动和更少的躯干运动。与对照组相比,dCIT + TR 组在 Fugl-Meyer 评估的整体和远端手臂评分中表现出更好的运动能力。dCIT + TR 和 dCIT 组的患侧手臂的功能使用明显更大。
dCIT + TR 通过改善抓握控制和逆转伸手抓握动作早期的代偿性躯干运动,产生了额外的益处。使用超出和在手臂范围内的实验任务可能会提高我们对最佳上肢康复的理解。