Suppr超能文献

绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术的技术:对英国专科中心实践情况的调查

Techniques for chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a survey of practice in specialist UK centres.

作者信息

Carlin A J, Alfirevic Z

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2008 Oct;28(10):914-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.2060.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines exist for amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS) practice, but there is no consensus regarding individual techniques. Our survey sought to review current practice within specialist centres in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

RCOG sub-specialist training centres were invited to complete a postal questionnaire, seeking their consultants' primary choices for amniocentesis and CVS techniques. Information sought included needle choice, local anaesthetic (LA), suction methods, quantity of samples obtained; and with regard to CVS, preferred approach [transcervical (TC) or transabdominal (TA)].

RESULTS

Response rate was 96% providing information on 111 consultants (111 amniocentesis/90 CVS). During amniocentesis, 86% use 22G needles and 70% are helped by an assistant who aspirates a set liquor volume (69%). For CVS, 98% use a TA approach, 89% use LA, and 29% an 18G single needle with 38% preferring a 17/19G double needle but no clear consensus regarding the use of assistants.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some agreement among specialists in the United Kingdom regarding techniques for invasive prenatal diagnosis. For amniocentesis, most operators use 22G needles, with an assistant to aspirate a set volume of fluid regardless of gestation. For CVS, there is considerable variation in needle choice, although most operators use a TA approach with LA.

摘要

目的

已有羊水穿刺术和绒毛取样(CVS)的操作指南,但对于具体技术尚无共识。我们的调查旨在回顾英国各专科中心的当前操作情况。

方法

邀请皇家妇产科医师学院(RCOG)的亚专科培训中心填写一份邮寄问卷,询问其顾问对于羊水穿刺术和CVS技术的主要选择。所寻求的信息包括针的选择、局部麻醉剂(LA)、抽吸方法、获取的样本量;对于CVS,还包括首选方法[经宫颈(TC)或经腹(TA)]。

结果

回复率为96%,提供了111位顾问的信息(111例羊水穿刺术/90例CVS)。在羊水穿刺术中,86%使用22G针,70%在助手抽吸一定量羊水(69%)的帮助下进行操作。对于CVS,98%采用经腹途径,89%使用局部麻醉剂,29%使用18G单针,38%更喜欢17/19G双针,但在是否使用助手方面没有明确共识。

结论

英国的专家们在侵入性产前诊断技术方面存在一些共识。对于羊水穿刺术,大多数操作者使用22G针,无论孕周如何,都有助手抽吸一定量的液体。对于CVS,针的选择存在很大差异,尽管大多数操作者采用经腹途径并使用局部麻醉剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验