Vandenbossche F, Horovitz J, Guyon F, Verret C, Saura R
Maternité B, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Feb;136(2):189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.03.020. Epub 2007 May 11.
To investigate the maternal perception of pain before and after amniocentesis (AC) or transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (TA-CVS).
Three hundred women were divided into groups of 100 participants destined to undergo three different fetal sampling procedures: amniocentesis (group 1), transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) with a 19 gauge Blache needle (group 2) and transabdominal CVS with a 20 gauge needle (group 3). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to quantify the patient's pre-sampling expected pain level and the real pain level was measured immediately after the sampling procedure. The factors liable to influence the VAS score after the sampling procedure were studied by single and multivariate analysis and concerned either the sampling procedure or patient demographic data.
The VAS scores obtained before the procedure were not significantly different for the three sampling groups. When performed with a 19 gauge Blache needle TA-CVS is significantly more painful than the other sampling procedures (p=0.0002): VAS score of 3.62 (group 2), 2.49 (group 3) and 2.68 (group 1) for CVS with 20 gauge needle and amniocentesis. Multivariate analysis identified a group of patients for which the perception of pain induced by sampling was higher compared to the other patients: nulliparous patients, having undergone 19 gauge Blache needle CVS, with a high pre-sampling VAS score.
Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling with a 19 gauge Blache needle seems to be the most painful sampling procedure. We question the need to use a 19 gauge needle as acceptable results are obtained with a 20 gauge needle.
探讨羊膜腔穿刺术(AC)或经腹绒毛取样术(TA-CVS)前后孕妇对疼痛的感知。
300名女性被分为三组,每组100人,分别接受三种不同的胎儿取样程序:羊膜腔穿刺术(第1组)、使用19号Blache针进行经腹绒毛取样术(第2组)和使用20号针进行经腹绒毛取样术(第3组)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)量化患者取样前预期的疼痛程度,并在取样程序完成后立即测量实际疼痛程度。通过单因素和多因素分析研究取样后影响VAS评分的因素,这些因素涉及取样程序或患者人口统计学数据。
三种取样组在操作前获得的VAS评分无显著差异。当使用19号Blache针进行经腹绒毛取样术时,其疼痛程度明显高于其他取样程序(p = 0.0002):20号针经腹绒毛取样术和羊膜腔穿刺术的VAS评分为,第2组3.62、第3组2.49和第1组2.68。多因素分析确定了一组患者,与其他患者相比,他们对取样引起的疼痛感知更高:未生育患者、接受1号Blache针经腹绒毛取样术、取样前VAS评分高。
使用19号Blache针进行经腹绒毛取样术似乎是最痛苦的取样程序。我们质疑使用19号针的必要性,因为使用20号针也能获得可接受的结果。