• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines.《单胎妊娠非整倍体侵入性产前诊断检测:主要指南的比较综述》。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 17;58(10):1472. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101472.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening and Diagnostic Testing from Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine: (2) Invasive Diagnostic Testing for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities.韩国母胎医学会产前非整倍体筛查和诊断检测临床实践指南:(2)胎儿染色体异常的有创性诊断检测。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jan 25;36(4):e26. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e26.
3
Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠非整倍体的产前筛查与诊断
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):754-67.
4
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
5
Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016.基于人群的超声指征下侵袭性产前诊断的趋势:1994 年至 2016 年二十年的变化。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):503-511. doi: 10.1002/uog.19107.
6
Chorionic Villus Sampling, Early Amniocentesis, and Termination of Pregnancy Without Diagnostic Testing: Comparison of Fetal Risk Following Positive Non-invasive Prenatal Testing.绒毛取样、早期羊膜腔穿刺术以及未经诊断性检测的妊娠终止:无创产前检测结果呈阳性后胎儿风险的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 May;38(5):441-445.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
7
New approach for estimating risk of miscarriage after chorionic villus sampling.绒毛膜取样后流产风险估计的新方法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;56(5):656-663. doi: 10.1002/uog.22041. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
8
Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis.绒毛膜绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术相关的流产风险。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):452-457. doi: 10.1002/uog.20293. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
9
First-trimester diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection after maternal primary infection in early pregnancy: feasibility study of viral genome amplification by PCR on chorionic villi obtained by CVS.早孕期原发感染孕妇绒毛活检病毒基因组 PCR 扩增技术用于先天性巨细胞病毒感染的早期诊断:可行性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;57(4):568-572. doi: 10.1002/uog.23608. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Women's choices for invasive or non-invasive testing: influence of gestational age and service delivery.女性对侵入性或非侵入性检测的选择:孕周和服务提供的影响。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(13):1217-1224. doi: 10.1002/pd.4960. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world antibiotic utilization during pregnancy in Italy: a multiregional retrospective population-based study.意大利孕期抗生素的真实世界使用情况:一项基于多地区人群的回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07605-0.
2
Amniocentesis in pregnancies at or beyond 24 weeks: an international multicenter study.孕24周及以上孕妇的羊膜腔穿刺术:一项国际多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;232(4):402.e1-402.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.025. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
3
Metabolomic Profiling of Second-Trimester Amniotic Fluid for Predicting Preterm Delivery: Insights from NMR Analysis.孕中期羊水代谢组学分析预测早产:核磁共振分析的见解
Metabolites. 2023 Nov 12;13(11):1147. doi: 10.3390/metabo13111147.
4
Placenta Accreta Spectrum Diagnosis Challenges and Controversies in Current Obstetrics: A Review.胎盘植入谱系疾病:当前产科诊断面临的挑战与争议综述
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Apr 20;15:635-654. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S395271. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive predictive value estimates for noninvasive prenatal testing from data of a prenatal diagnosis laboratory and literature review.基于产前诊断实验室数据及文献综述的无创产前检测阳性预测值评估
Mol Cytogenet. 2022 Jul 6;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13039-022-00607-z.
2
Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Mosaicism in Over 18,000 Pregnancies: A Five-Year Single-Tertiary-Center Retrospective Analysis.超过18000例妊娠中染色体镶嵌现象的产前诊断:一项为期五年的单中心回顾性分析
Front Genet. 2022 May 16;13:876887. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.876887. eCollection 2022.
3
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: Green-top Guideline No. 8 July 2021: Green-top Guideline No. 8.羊膜腔穿刺术和绒毛取样:2021年7月绿皮书指南第8号:绿皮书指南第8号
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):e1-e15. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16821. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
4
Cell-free fetal DNA testing and its correlation with prenatal indications.游离胎儿 DNA 检测及其与产前指征的相关性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 24;21(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04044-5.
5
Counseling in maternal-fetal medicine: SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy.母胎医学咨询:妊娠期 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
6
Amniocentesis learning curve using a low-cost simulation model to teach maternal-fetal medicine fellows.使用低成本模拟模型教授母胎医学研究员行羊膜腔穿刺术的学习曲线。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;153(1):95-99. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13416. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
7
Factors affecting cell-free DNA fetal fraction: statistical analysis of 13,661 maternal plasmas for non-invasive prenatal screening.影响游离胎儿 DNA 分数的因素:对 13661 例母体血浆进行非侵入性产前筛查的统计分析。
Hum Genomics. 2019 Dec 4;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40246-019-0244-0.
8
Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review of the literature.羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样后流产的风险:文献系统评价
Minerva Ginecol. 2018 Apr;70(2):215-219. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04178-8. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.用于产前诊断的羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 4;9(9):CD003252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2.
10
No. 348-Joint SOGC-CCMG Guideline: Update on Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy, Fetal Anomalies, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.第348号-加拿大妇产科医师学会与加拿大医学遗传学会联合指南:胎儿非整倍体、胎儿畸形及不良妊娠结局的产前筛查更新
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Sep;39(9):805-817. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.032.

《单胎妊娠非整倍体侵入性产前诊断检测:主要指南的比较综述》。

Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines.

机构信息

Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Access to Genome-ATG, Clinical Laboratory Genetics, 551 34 Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 17;58(10):1472. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101472.

DOI:10.3390/medicina58101472
PMID:36295632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9609299/
Abstract

Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (IPDT), mainly including amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS). The aim of this comparative review was to summarize and compare the existing recommendations on IPDT from the most influential guidelines. All the reviewed guidelines highlight that IPDT is indicated based on a positive screening test rather than maternal age alone. Other indications arise from medical history and sonography, with significant variations identified between the guidelines. The earlier time for amniocentesis is unequivocally set at ≥15 gestational weeks, whereas for CVS, the earlier limit varies from ≥10 to ≥11 weeks. Certain technical aspects and the overall approach demonstrate significant differences. Periprocedural management regarding Rhesus alloimmunization, virologic status and use of anesthesia or antibiotics are either inconsistent or insufficiently addressed. The synthesis of an evidence-based algorithm for IPDT is of crucial importance to healthcare professionals implicated in prenatal care to avoid unnecessary interventions without compromising optimal prenatal care.

摘要

复杂的遗传异常筛查方案是当前产前护理的一个重要组成部分,旨在识别高风险妊娠,并就各种选择为父母提供适当的咨询。只有通过有创性产前诊断检测(IPDT)才能进行明确的产前诊断,主要包括羊膜穿刺术和绒毛膜取样(CVS)。本综述比较研究的目的是总结和比较最有影响力的指南中关于 IPDT 的现有建议。所有审查的指南都强调,IPDT 是基于阳性筛查试验而不仅仅是母亲年龄来指示的。其他适应症源于病史和超声检查,指南之间存在明显差异。羊膜穿刺术的较早时间明确设定为≥15 孕周,而对于 CVS,较早的限制范围从≥10 周至≥11 周。某些技术方面和总体方法存在显著差异。关于 Rh 同种免疫、病毒学状态以及麻醉或抗生素使用的围手术期管理要么不一致,要么没有充分解决。制定基于证据的 IPDT 算法对于参与产前护理的医疗保健专业人员至关重要,以避免不必要的干预,同时又不影响最佳产前护理。