• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的计步器干预措施的真实世界评估

Real-world evaluation of a community-based pedometer intervention.

作者信息

Chan Catherine B, Tudor-Locke Catrine

机构信息

Department of Physiology and the Alberta Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2008 Sep;5(5):648-64. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.5.648.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.5.5.648
PMID:18820342
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated a pedometer-based community intervention under real-world conditions.

METHODS

Participants (n=559) provided demographic and health information using surveys and steps/d at baseline and during the last week the participants were in the program. A 1-year follow-up was conducted, but in keeping with real-world conditions, no incentives were offered to participate.

RESULTS

Participants (89% female, age 48.1 [SD=12] years) took 7864 (3114) steps/d at baseline. Postprogram voluntary response rates to mailed surveys were 41.3% at 12 weeks and 22.8% at 1 year. Program completers reported significantly higher steps/d at 12 weeks (approximately 12,000 steps/d) and 1 year (approximately 11,000 steps/d) compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement in steps/d in this real-world implementation was consistent with more controlled studies of pedometer-based interventions. Low response to voluntary follow-up is a study limitation but is expected of real-world evaluations.

摘要

背景

我们在实际环境中评估了一项基于计步器的社区干预措施。

方法

参与者(n = 559)在基线时以及参与项目的最后一周通过调查问卷提供人口统计学和健康信息以及每日步数。进行了为期1年的随访,但与实际情况一致,未提供参与激励措施。

结果

参与者(89%为女性,年龄48.1 [标准差 = 12]岁)在基线时每日步数为7864(3114)步。项目结束后,邮寄调查问卷的自愿回复率在12周时为41.3%,在1年时为22.8%。与基线相比,项目完成者在12周时(约每日12,000步)和1年时(约每日11,000步)报告的每日步数显著更高。

结论

在这一实际实施过程中每日步数的增加与基于计步器干预措施的更多对照研究结果一致。自愿随访的低回复率是本研究的一个局限,但在实际评估中是预期的。

相似文献

1
Real-world evaluation of a community-based pedometer intervention.基于社区的计步器干预措施的真实世界评估
J Phys Act Health. 2008 Sep;5(5):648-64. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.5.648.
2
Participant experiences in a workplace pedometer-based physical activity program.参与者在基于计步器的职场体育活动计划中的体验。
J Phys Act Health. 2008 Sep;5(5):675-687. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.5.675.
3
A preliminary study on the impact of a pedometer-based intervention on daily steps.一项基于计步器的干预措施对每日步数影响的初步研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2004 Jan-Feb;18(3):217-20. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.3.217.
4
Effectiveness of a web-based, computer-tailored, pedometer-based physical activity intervention for adults: a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项针对成年人的基于网络、计算机定制、计步器的体育活动干预措施的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 9;17(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3402.
5
Monitoring capabilities of the Omron HJ-720ITC pedometer.欧姆龙 HJ-720ITC 计步器的监测功能。
Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Feb;42(1):24-9. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.02.2044.
6
Physicians promoting physical activity using pedometers and community partnerships: a real world trial.医生使用计步器和社区伙伴关系促进身体活动:真实世界试验。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):284-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.069567. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
7
Daily pedometer steps among older men: associations with health-related quality of life and psychosocial health.老年人日常计步数与健康相关生活质量和心理社会健康的关系。
Am J Health Promot. 2013 May-Jun;27(5):294-8. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120316-QUAN-145. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
8
Should all steps count when using a pedometer as a measure of physical activity in older adults?在将计步器用作老年人身体活动量度时,所有步骤都应计算在内吗?
J Phys Act Health. 2007 Jul;4(3):305-14. doi: 10.1123/jpah.4.3.305.
9
Comparisons of accelerometer and pedometer determined steps in free living samples.在自由生活样本中比较加速度计和计步器测定的步数。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Mar;8(3):390-7. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.3.390.
10
Effectiveness of the 2006 Commonwealth Games 10,000 Steps Walking Challenge.2006年英联邦运动会一万步步行挑战赛的成效
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Aug;41(8):1673-80. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31819d591d.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between objectively-measured and self-reported neighbourhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention.客观测量和自我报告的邻里可步行性与互联网推送计步器干预期间的依从性和步数之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0242999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242999. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparing accelerometer, pedometer and a questionnaire for measuring physical activity in bronchiectasis: a validity and feasibility study?比较加速度计、计步器和问卷在测量支气管扩张症患者身体活动方面的应用:一项效度与可行性研究?
Respir Res. 2017 Jan 14;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0497-2.
3
Investigating the effect of a 3-month workplace-based pedometer-driven walking programme on health-related quality of life in meat processing workers: a feasibility study within a randomized controlled trial.
调查一项为期3个月的基于工作场所的计步器驱动步行计划对肉类加工工人健康相关生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验中的可行性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 22;15:410. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1736-z.
4
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.全社区范围内增加身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3.
5
Promoting physical activity in patients with colon adenomas: a randomized pilot intervention trial.促进患有结肠腺瘤患者的身体活动:一项随机试点干预试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039719. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
6
Promoting Lifestyle Physical Activity: Experiences with the First Step Program.推广生活方式中的体育活动:“第一步计划”的经验
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009 Jul 1;3(1 Suppl):508-548. doi: 10.1177/1559827609331710.
7
Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.计步器为何有效?——对与成功增加身体活动相关因素的反思。
Sports Med. 2009;39(12):981-93. doi: 10.2165/11319600-000000000-00000.