Suppr超能文献

混合临床样本中Tomm表现与PAI效度量表之间的关系。

Relationship between Tomm performance and PAI validity scales in a mixed clinical sample.

作者信息

Whiteside Douglas M, Dunbar-Mayer Philip, Waters Dana P

机构信息

Argosy University-Seattle, American School of Professional Psychology, Seattle WA 98121, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Apr;23(3):523-33. doi: 10.1080/13854040802389169. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

Abstract

This study addressed the relationship between Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) validity indicators and cognitive effort measures on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Significant correlations were found between TOMM and some PAI validity scales. Factor analysis results found separate cognitive and personality components, but the Negative Impression Management (NIM) scale, a measure of response bias, had factor loadings on both the cognitive and the personality components. Follow-up hierarchical multiple regression and t-test analysis generally confirmed this result, and found that NIM and the Infrequency (INF) scale have significant relationships with the TOMM. The results indicate that individuals with elevations on the PAI's INF and NIM scales often display decreased cognitive effort on the TOMM. The current results support the hypothesis that personality assessment validity indicators have a modest but significant relationship with poor cognitive effort.

摘要

本研究探讨了人格评估量表(PAI)效度指标与记忆伪装测验(TOMM)上认知努力测量之间的关系。研究发现TOMM与一些PAI效度量表之间存在显著相关性。因子分析结果发现了独立的认知和人格成分,但作为反应偏差测量指标的负面印象管理(NIM)量表在认知和人格成分上均有因子载荷。后续的分层多元回归和t检验分析总体上证实了这一结果,并发现NIM和低频(INF)量表与TOMM存在显著关系。结果表明,PAI的INF和NIM量表得分较高的个体在TOMM上往往表现出认知努力下降。当前结果支持了这样一种假设,即人格评估效度指标与较差的认知努力之间存在适度但显著的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验