Whitney Kriscinda A, Davis Jeremy J, Shepard Polly H, Herman Steven M
Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):777-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
The present study represents a replication and extension of the original Response Bias Scale (RBS) validation study. In addition to examining the relationship between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), RBS, and several other well-researched Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) validity scales (i.e., F, Fb, Fp, and the Fake Bad Scale), the present study also included the recently developed Infrequency Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale and the Henry-Heilbronner Index (HHI) of the MMPI-2. Findings from this retrospective data analysis (N=46) demonstrated the superiority of the RBS, and to a certain extent the HHI, over other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM failure within the outpatient Veterans Affairs population. Results of the current study confirm the clinical utility of the RBS and suggest that, particularly if the MMPI-2 is an existing part of the neuropsychological assessment, examination of RBS scores is an efficient means of detecting negative response bias.
本研究是对原始反应偏差量表(RBS)验证研究的重复和扩展。除了检验记忆伪装测验(TOMM)、RBS与其他几个经过充分研究的明尼苏达多相人格问卷第二版(MMPI - 2)效度量表(即F、Fb、Fp和假坏量表)之间的关系外,本研究还纳入了最近编制的创伤后应激障碍低频量表以及MMPI - 2的亨利 - 海尔布隆纳指数(HHI)。这项回顾性数据分析(N = 46)的结果表明,在预测退伍军人事务部门诊患者的TOMM失败方面,RBS以及在一定程度上HHI优于其他MMPI - 2效度量表。当前研究结果证实了RBS的临床效用,并表明,特别是如果MMPI - 2是神经心理学评估的现有组成部分,检查RBS分数是检测负性反应偏差的有效手段。