Schwinning Susanne
Department of Biology, Texas State University-San Marcos, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.
Oecologia. 2008 Dec;158(3):373-83. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1147-2. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
The ecohydrology of karst has not received much attention, despite the disproportionally large contribution of karst aquifers to freshwater supplies. Karst savannas, like many savannas elsewhere, are encroached by woody plants, with possibly negative consequences on aquifer recharge. However, the role of savanna tree species in hydrological processes remains unclear, not least because the location and water absorption zones of tree roots in the spatially complex subsurface strata are unknown. This study examined the water sources and water relations of two savanna trees, Quercus fusiformis (Small) and Juniperus ashei (Buchholz) in the karst region of the eastern Edwards Plateau, Texas (USA). Stable isotope analysis of stem water revealed that both species took up evaporatively enriched water during the warm season, suggesting a relatively shallow water source in the epikarst, the transition zone between soil and bedrock. Q. fusiformis had consistently higher predawn water potentials than J. ashei during drought, and thus was probably deeper-rooted and less capable of maintaining gas exchange at low water potentials. Although the water potential of both species recovered after drought-breaking spring and summer rain events, associated shifts in stem water isotope ratios did not indicate significant uptake of rainwater from the shallow soil. A hypothesis is developed to explain this phenomenon invoking a piston-flow mechanism that pushes water stored in macropores into the active root zones of the trees. Epikarst structure varied greatly with parent material and topography, and had strong effects on seasonal fluctuations in plant water status. The study suggests that tree species of the Edwards Plateau do not commonly reduce aquifer recharge by tapping directly into perched water tables, but more likely by reducing water storage in the epikarst. A more general conclusion is that models of savanna water relations based on Walter's two-layer model may not apply unequivocally to karst savannas.
尽管岩溶泉含水层对淡水供应的贡献不成比例地大,但岩溶生态水文学并未受到太多关注。与其他许多稀树草原一样,岩溶稀树草原正受到木本植物的侵蚀,这可能会对含水层补给产生负面影响。然而,稀树草原树种在水文过程中的作用仍不清楚,尤其是因为树根在空间复杂的地下地层中的位置和吸水区域尚不清楚。本研究调查了美国得克萨斯州东部爱德华兹高原岩溶地区的两种稀树草原树木——梭状栎(Small)和灰叶刺柏(Buchholz)的水源和水分关系。对树干水的稳定同位素分析表明,这两个物种在温暖季节都吸收了蒸发浓缩水,这表明在表层岩溶带(土壤和基岩之间的过渡带)存在相对较浅的水源。在干旱期间,梭状栎的黎明前水势始终高于灰叶刺柏,因此其根系可能更深,在低水势下维持气体交换的能力较弱。尽管在干旱结束后的春夏季降雨事件后,两个物种的水势都有所恢复,但树干水同位素比值的相关变化并未表明从浅层土壤中大量吸收了雨水。本文提出了一个假设来解释这一现象,即采用活塞流机制将大孔隙中储存的水推到树木的活跃根区。表层岩溶结构随母质和地形的变化很大,对植物水分状况的季节性波动有强烈影响。该研究表明,爱德华兹高原的树种通常不会通过直接利用上层滞水来减少含水层补给,而更可能是通过减少表层岩溶带的水分储存来实现。一个更普遍的结论是,基于沃尔特两层模型的稀树草原水分关系模型可能并不完全适用于岩溶稀树草原。