Bhuiya Abbas, Hanifi S M A, Mahmood Shehrin Shaila
Public Health Sciences Division, ICDDR,B, GPO Box 128, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2008 Sep;26(3):378-83. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v26i3.1902.
Equity and gender, despite being universal concerns for all health programmes in Bangladesh, are often missing in many of the health agenda. The health programmes fail to address these important dimensions unless these are specifically included in the planning stage of a programme and are continually monitored for progress. This paper presents the situation of equity in health in Bangladesh, innovations in monitoring equity in the use of health services in general and by the poor in particular, and impact of targeted non-health interventions on health outcomes of the poor. It was argued that an equitable use of health services might also result in enhanced overall coverage of the services. The findings show that government services at the upazila level are used by the poor proportionately more than they are in the community, while at the private facilities, the situation is reverse. Commonly-used monitoring tools, at times, are not very useful for the programme managers to know how well they are doing in reaching the poor. Use of benefit-incidence ratio may provide a quick feedback to the health facility managers about their extent of serving the poor. Similarly, Lot Quality Assurance Sampling can be an easy-to-use tool for monitoring coverage at the community level requiring a very small sample size. Although health problems are biomedical phenomena, their solutions may include actions beyond the biomedical framework. Studies have shown that non-health interventions targeted towards the poor improve the use of health services and reduce mortality among children in poor households. The study on equity and health deals with various interlocking issues, and the examples and views presented in this paper intend to introduce their importance in designing and managing health and development programmes.
公平与性别问题,尽管是孟加拉国所有卫生项目普遍关注的问题,但在许多卫生议程中却常常缺失。除非这些问题在项目规划阶段被明确纳入,并持续监测进展情况,否则卫生项目无法解决这些重要方面。本文介绍了孟加拉国卫生公平状况、监测总体卫生服务利用情况特别是贫困人口卫生服务利用情况的创新方法,以及有针对性的非卫生干预措施对贫困人口健康结果的影响。有人认为,公平利用卫生服务也可能提高服务的总体覆盖率。研究结果表明,贫困人群使用县一级政府服务的比例高于社区平均水平,而在私立医疗机构,情况则相反。常用的监测工具有时对项目管理人员了解他们在服务贫困人口方面的表现并无太大帮助。使用受益发生率可能会为卫生机构管理人员提供有关其服务贫困人口程度的快速反馈。同样,批量质量保证抽样可以是一种易于使用的工具,用于监测社区层面的覆盖率,所需样本量非常小。尽管健康问题是生物医学现象,但其解决方案可能包括生物医学框架之外的行动。研究表明,针对贫困人口的非卫生干预措施可改善卫生服务的利用情况,并降低贫困家庭儿童的死亡率。关于公平与健康的研究涉及各种相互关联的问题,本文所举的例子和提出的观点旨在介绍它们在设计和管理卫生与发展项目中的重要性。