Sadler D D, Perrine M W, Peck R C
Research and Development Office, California Department of Motor Vehicles, Sacramento 95853.
Accid Anal Prev. 1991 Aug;23(4):203-24. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(91)90001-l.
During the 4-year period following a repeat driving under the influence (DUI) conviction, participants in 12-month treatment programs had worse overall traffic safety records than did recipients of license suspensions. The results from a series of analyses using repeated measures analysis of covariance showed that, in comparison with license-suspension recipients: (i) participants had significantly higher rates (70%) of nonalcohol-related accidents and convictions, (ii) participants had a significantly lower rate (9%) of alcohol-related convictions, but no difference was found on alcohol-related accidents, and (iii) participants had a significantly higher rate (30%) of total accidents (p less than .05). These results suggest that the use of license-suspension waiver as an incentive to participate in a drinking driver program had a negative impact on traffic safety. The predicted reductions in alcohol-related accidents among program participants did not occur, and reductions in nonalcohol-related accidents, which could have been achieved with license suspensions, were sacrificed. It was recommended that some other alternative besides license-suspension waivers be used as an inducement for repeat DUI offenders to participate in treatment.
在因酒后驾车（DUI）再次被定罪后的4年期间，参加12个月治疗项目的参与者的整体交通安全记录比被吊销驾照者更差。一系列使用重复测量协方差分析的结果表明，与被吊销驾照者相比：（i）参与者非酒精相关事故和定罪的发生率显著更高（70%），（ii）参与者酒精相关定罪的发生率显著更低（9%），但在酒精相关事故方面未发现差异，（iii）参与者总事故发生率显著更高（30%）（p小于0.05）。这些结果表明，将吊销驾照豁免作为参与酒驾项目的激励措施对交通安全产生了负面影响。项目参与者中与酒精相关事故预计的减少并未发生，并且牺牲了通过吊销驾照本可实现的非酒精相关事故的减少。建议使用除吊销驾照豁免之外的其他替代方法作为引诱再次酒驾违法者参与治疗的手段。
