Suppr超能文献

配偶交流在夫妻应对心力衰竭中的预后意义。

Prognostic significance of spouse we talk in couples coping with heart failure.

作者信息

Rohrbaugh Michael J, Mehl Matthias R, Shoham Varda, Reilly Elizabeth S, Ewy Gordon A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Oct;76(5):781-9. doi: 10.1037/a0013238.

Abstract

Recent research suggests that marital quality predicts the survival of patients with heart failure (HF), and it is hypothesized that a communal orientation to coping marked by first-person plural pronoun use (we talk) may be a factor in this. During a home interview, 57 HF patients (46 men and 16 women) and their spouses discussed how they coped with the patients' health problems. Analysis of pronoun counts from both partners revealed that we talk by the spouse, but not the patient, independently predicted positive change in the patient's HF symptoms and general health over the next 6 months and did so better than direct self-report measures of marital quality and the communal coping construct. We talk by the patient and spouse did not correlate, however, and gender had no apparent moderating effects on how pronoun use predicted health change. The results highlight the utility of automatic text analysis in couple-interaction research and provide further evidence that looking beyond the patient can improve prediction of health outcomes.

摘要

近期研究表明,婚姻质量可预测心力衰竭(HF)患者的存活情况,据推测,以使用第一人称复数代词(我们谈论)为特征的共同应对取向可能是其中一个因素。在一次家庭访谈中,57名HF患者(46名男性和16名女性)及其配偶讨论了他们如何应对患者的健康问题。对双方代词使用次数的分析显示,配偶而非患者的“我们谈论”独立预测了患者在接下来6个月中心力衰竭症状和总体健康状况的积极变化,且比婚姻质量和共同应对结构的直接自我报告测量方法做得更好。然而,患者和配偶的“我们谈论”并无关联,并且性别对代词使用预测健康变化的方式没有明显的调节作用。研究结果凸显了自动文本分析在夫妻互动研究中的效用,并进一步证明,超越患者本身进行观察有助于改善对健康结果的预测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验