• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年时期风险认知与观点采择的发展变化及个体差异。

Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence.

作者信息

Crone Eveline A, Bullens L, van der Plas E A A, Kijkuit E J, Zelazo P D

机构信息

Leiden University Institute for Psychological Research, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1213-29. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000588.

DOI:10.1017/S0954579408000588
PMID:18838039
Abstract

Despite the assumed prevalence of risk-taking behavior in adolescence, the laboratory evidence of risk taking remains scarce, and the individual variation poorly understood. Drawing from neuroscience studies, we tested whether risk and reward orientation are influenced by the perspective that adolescents take when making risky decisions. Perspective taking was manipulated by cuing participants prior to each choice whether the decision was made for "self," or from the perspective of an "other" (the experimenter in Experiment 1; a hypothetical peer in Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, we show a developmental decrease in risk-taking behavior across different stages of adolescence. In addition, all age groups made fewer risky choices for the experimenter, but the difference between self and other was larger in early adolescence. In Experiment 2, we show that high sensation-seeking (SS) adolescents make more risky choices than low SS adolescents, but both groups make a similar differentiation for other individuals (low risk-taking or high risk-taking peers). Together, the results show that younger adolescents and high SS adolescents make more risky choices for themselves, but can appreciate that others may make fewer risky choices. The developmental change toward more rational decisions versus emotional, impulsive decisions may reflect, in part, more efficient integration of others' perspectives into one's decision making. These developmental results are discussed regarding brain systems important for risk taking and perspective taking.

摘要

尽管普遍认为冒险行为在青少年时期很常见,但冒险行为的实验室证据仍然很少,而且个体差异也知之甚少。借鉴神经科学研究,我们测试了冒险和奖励取向是否受青少年在做出冒险决策时所采取的视角影响。通过在每次选择前提示参与者该决策是为“自己”做出的,还是从“他人”(实验1中的实验者;实验2中的假设同龄人)的视角做出的,来操纵视角采择。在实验1中,我们发现冒险行为在青少年不同阶段呈发展性下降。此外,所有年龄组为实验者做出的冒险选择都更少,但在青春期早期,为自己和为他人做出的选择之间的差异更大。在实验2中,我们发现高感觉寻求(SS)的青少年比低感觉寻求的青少年做出更多冒险选择,但两组在针对其他个体(低冒险或高冒险同龄人)时做出的区分相似。总之,结果表明,年龄较小的青少年和高感觉寻求的青少年为自己做出更多冒险选择,但能意识到他人可能会做出较少的冒险选择。从情绪化、冲动的决策转向更理性的决策这一发展变化可能部分反映了将他人视角更有效地整合到自己的决策过程中。我们结合对冒险和视角采择至关重要的脑系统来讨论这些发展结果。

相似文献

1
Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence.青少年时期风险认知与观点采择的发展变化及个体差异。
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1213-29. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000588.
2
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
3
Adolescent risky decision-making: neurocognitive development of reward and control regions.青少年冒险决策:奖励和控制区域的神经认知发展。
Neuroimage. 2010 May 15;51(1):345-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.038. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
4
[Risk-taking in adolescence: A neuroeconomics approach].[青少年的冒险行为:一种神经经济学方法]
Encephale. 2010 Apr;36(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
5
Gambling for self, friends, and antagonists: differential contributions of affective and social brain regions on adolescent reward processing.为自己、朋友和对手赌博:情感和社交脑区对青少年奖励处理的不同贡献。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:281-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
6
Joint Effects of Peer Presence and Fatigue on Risk and Reward Processing in Late Adolescence.同伴在场和疲劳对青少年后期风险和奖励处理的联合影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Sep;46(9):1878-1890. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0690-8. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of reward-related brain activation: effects of age, pubertal stage, and reward sensitivity.与奖励相关的大脑激活的横断面和纵向分析:年龄、青春期阶段和奖励敏感性的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2014 Aug;89:3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.005. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
8
A developmental study of risky decisions on the cake gambling task: age and gender analyses of probability estimation and reward evaluation.蛋糕赌博任务中风险决策的发展性研究:概率估计与奖励评估的年龄及性别分析
Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(2):179-96. doi: 10.1080/87565640701884287.
9
Acute stress increases risky decisions and dampens prefrontal activation among adolescent boys.急性应激会增加青少年男性的冒险决策,并抑制前额叶的激活。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:679-689. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.067. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Risk-Taking Behavior in a Computerized Driving Task: Brain Activation Correlates of Decision-Making, Outcome, and Peer Influence in Male Adolescents.计算机化驾驶任务中的冒险行为:男性青少年决策、结果和同伴影响的脑激活关联
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 8;10(6):e0129516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129516. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling Support for Violent and Non-violent Radicalization among Adolescents: A Latent Profile Analysis.青少年暴力和非暴力激进化支持的解析:潜在剖面分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Sep;53(9):1953-1970. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01988-7. Epub 2024 May 3.
2
Friendship changes differentially predict neural correlates of decision-making for friends across adolescence.友谊的差异变化可预测青少年时期与朋友决策相关的神经关联。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Feb;65:101342. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101342. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
Temporal discounting for self and friends in adolescence: A fMRI study.
青少年时期的自我和朋友的时间贴现:一项 fMRI 研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Apr;60:101204. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101204. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Inhibitory Control Development: A Network Neuroscience Perspective.抑制控制发展:网络神经科学视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:651547. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.651547. eCollection 2022.
5
Regulation of sex differences in risk-based decision making by gonadal hormones: Insights from rodent models.调节基于风险的决策中的性别差异的性腺激素:来自啮齿动物模型的见解。
Behav Processes. 2022 Aug;200:104663. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104663. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Investigating the association between smoking, environmental tobacco smoke exposure and reward-related brain activity in adolescent experimental smokers.探究青少年实验吸烟者中吸烟、环境烟草烟雾暴露与奖赏相关脑活动之间的关联。
Addict Biol. 2022 Jan;27(1):e13070. doi: 10.1111/adb.13070. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Self-oriented neural circuitry predicts other-oriented adaptive risks in adolescence: a longitudinal study.自我导向的神经回路预测青少年时期的他人导向的适应性风险:一项纵向研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Feb 15;17(2):161-171. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab076.
8
Developmental Changes and Individual Differences in Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence.青少年时期信任和互惠的发展变化及个体差异。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):192-208. doi: 10.1111/jora.12459. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Family conflict shapes how adolescents take risks when their family is affected.家庭冲突影响青少年在家庭受影响时如何冒险。
Dev Sci. 2018 Jul;21(4):e12611. doi: 10.1111/desc.12611. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
10
Flexing dual-systems models: How variable cognitive control in children informs our understanding of risk-taking across development.灵活运用双系统模型:儿童可变的认知控制如何增进我们对整个发展过程中冒险行为的理解。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;27:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 16.