Suppr超能文献

胸段食管鳞状细胞癌根治术后预防性放疗的范围

Extent of prophylactic postoperative radiotherapy after radical surgery of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Lu J-C, Tao H, Zhang Y-Q, Zha W-W, Qian P-D, Li F, Xu K-X

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(6):502-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00797.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess if the entire mediastinum (M), the bilateral supraclavicular area (S), and the left gastric area (L) should be all included in the irradiation volume. The clinical data of 204 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone prophylactic postoperative radiotherapy after radical surgery were retrospectively reviewed. They were classified into four groups: group A, 26 patients with irradiated M alone; group B, 139 patients with irradiated M + S; group C, 10 patients with irradiated M + L; and group D, 29 patients with irradiated M + S + L. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 36% in group A, 31% in group B, 40% in group C and 44% in group D (chi2=3.05, P =0.39), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the irradiated extent was not a significant influential factor (hazard ratio=0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.03, P =0.10). None of 43 patients without the L irradiated and with disease in the upper and middle upper thirds (defined in middle third but with upper third invaded), and one of 83 patients without the L irradiated and with disease in the middle third only thoracic esophagus were shown to have abdominal lymph node metastasis. Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in patients in the lower and middle lower thirds (defined in middle third but with lower third invaded) were, respectively, 1/43 and 1/18 whether the S was irradiated or not. It seems unnecessary that the L be irradiated when the primary site is in the upper, middle, and middle upper thirds of the thoracic esophagus after radical surgery. Similarly, S may be unnecessarily irradiated in the lower and middle lower thirds.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估放疗体积是否应包括整个纵隔(M)、双侧锁骨上区(S)和左胃区(L)。回顾性分析了204例胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者根治性手术后接受预防性术后放疗的临床资料。他们被分为四组:A组,26例仅接受M区放疗;B组,139例接受M + S区放疗;C组,10例接受M + L区放疗;D组,29例接受M + S + L区放疗。A、B、C、D组的5年无病生存率分别为36%、31%、40%和44%(χ2 = 3.05,P = 0.39)。多因素分析显示,放疗范围不是一个显著的影响因素(风险比= 0.84,95%置信区间,0.69 - 1.03,P = 0.10)。43例原发部位在食管上三分之一和中上三分之一(定义为中三分之一但侵犯上三分之一)且未接受L区放疗的患者中,无1例出现腹部淋巴结转移;83例仅食管中三分之一有病变且未接受L区放疗的患者中,仅1例出现腹部淋巴结转移。食管下三分之一和中下三分之一(定义为中三分之一但侵犯下三分之一)的患者,无论是否接受S区放疗,锁骨上淋巴结转移率分别为1/43和1/18。对于胸段食管上、中、中上三分之一的原发部位,根治性手术后似乎没有必要对L区进行放疗。同样,对于食管下三分之一和中下三分之一,对S区进行放疗可能也是不必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验