Bonilha Heather Shaw, Deliyski Dimitar D, Gerlach Terri Treman
Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, 1621 Greene Street, 6th Floor, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Nov;17(4):367-76. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0059). Epub 2008 Oct 7.
To ascertain the amount of phase asymmetry of the vocal fold vibration in normophonic speakers via visualization techniques and compare findings for habitual and pressed phonations.
Fifty-two normophonic speakers underwent stroboscopy and high-speed videoendoscopy (HSV). The HSV images were further processed into 4 visual displays: HSV playbacks, digital kymography (DKG) playbacks, mucosal wave kymography playbacks, and static kymographic images of the medial line from the DKG playback. Two types of phase asymmetries, left-right and anterior-posterior, were rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Objective measures of left-right phase asymmetry were obtained.
The majority of normophonic speakers (81%) were noted to display anterior-posterior asymmetry; however, 66% of those were characterized as mild. Seventy-nine percent of participants were noted to display left-right asymmetry; however, 72% of those were mild. A moderate relationship between the objective measures and subjective ratings was found.
Most normophonic speakers exhibit mild left-right and anterior-posterior asymmetries for both habitual and pressed phonations. Asymmetries were noted more often during habitual than pressed phonations, and when visualized by HSV and kymography than stroboscopy. Differences between objective measures and visual judgments support the need to quantify vocal fold vibratory features.
通过可视化技术确定正常发声者声带振动的相位不对称量,并比较习惯性发声和挤压发声的结果。
52名正常发声者接受了频闪喉镜检查和高速视频内镜检查(HSV)。HSV图像进一步处理成4种视觉显示:HSV回放、数字记波图(DKG)回放、黏膜波记波图回放以及来自DKG回放的中线静态记波图像。两种相位不对称类型,即左右不对称和前后不对称按照1至5级进行评分。获得了左右相位不对称的客观测量值。
大多数正常发声者(81%)被发现存在前后不对称;然而,其中66%为轻度。79%的参与者被发现存在左右不对称;然而,其中72%为轻度。发现客观测量值与主观评分之间存在中等程度的相关性。
大多数正常发声者在习惯性发声和挤压发声时均表现出轻度的左右和前后不对称。与挤压发声相比,习惯性发声时更常出现不对称,并且通过HSV和记波图观察时比频闪喉镜检查时更常发现不对称。客观测量值与视觉判断之间的差异支持了对声带振动特征进行量化的必要性。