Suppr超能文献

肿瘤专家委员会建议对局部晚期头颈癌治疗结果的影响。

Impact of tumor board recommendations on treatment outcome for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

作者信息

Nguyen Nam P, Vos Paul, Lee Howard, Borok Thomas L, Karlsson Ulf, Martinez Tomas, Welsh James, Cohen Deirdre, Hamilton Russell, Nguyen Nga, Nguyen Ly M, Vinh-Hung Vincent

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724-5081, USA.

出版信息

Oncology. 2008;75(3-4):186-91. doi: 10.1159/000163058. Epub 2008 Oct 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To identify physician selection factors in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer and how treatment outcome is affected by Tumor Board recommendations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 213 patients treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer in a single institution was performed. All treatments followed Tumor Board recommendations: 115 patients had chemotherapy and radiation, and 98 patients received postoperative radiation. Patient characteristics, treatment toxicity, locoregional control and survival between these two treatment groups were compared. Patient survival was compared with survival data reported in randomized studies of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

RESULTS

There were no differences in comorbidity factors, and T or N stages between the two groups. A statistically significant number of patients with oropharyngeal and oral cavity tumors had chemoradiation and postoperative radiation, respectively (p < 0.0001). Grade 3-4 toxicities during treatment were 48 and 87% for the postoperative radiation and chemoradiation groups, respectively (p = 0.0001). There were no differences in survival, locoregional recurrences and distant metastases between the two groups. Patient survival was comparable to survival rates reported by randomized studies of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

CONCLUSION

Disease sites remained the key determining factor for treatment selection. Multidisciplinary approaches provided optimal treatment outcome for locally advanced head and neck cancer, with overall survival in these patients being comparable to that reported in randomized clinical trials.

摘要

背景/目的:确定局部晚期头颈癌治疗中医生的选择因素,以及肿瘤委员会的建议如何影响治疗结果。

方法

对一家机构中213例接受局部晚期头颈癌治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。所有治疗均遵循肿瘤委员会的建议:115例患者接受化疗和放疗,98例患者接受术后放疗。比较这两个治疗组的患者特征、治疗毒性、局部区域控制和生存率。将患者生存率与局部晚期头颈癌随机研究报告的生存数据进行比较。

结果

两组之间的合并症因素、T或N分期无差异。口咽和口腔肿瘤患者分别接受放化疗和术后放疗的比例具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。术后放疗组和放化疗组治疗期间3-4级毒性分别为48%和87%(p = 0.0001)。两组之间的生存率、局部区域复发和远处转移无差异。患者生存率与局部晚期头颈癌随机研究报告的生存率相当。

结论

疾病部位仍然是治疗选择的关键决定因素。多学科方法为局部晚期头颈癌提供了最佳治疗结果,这些患者的总生存率与随机临床试验报告的相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验