Pero Ronald W, Lund Harald, Leanderson Tomas
Institute of Clinical Medical Science, Lund University, BMC I:13, Lund, Sweden.
Phytother Res. 2009 Mar;23(3):335-46. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2628.
For over 50 years, hippuric/quinic acids were believed to have no biological efficacy. Here data are presented to support the hypothesis that quinic acid is not responsible for any efficacy, but rather that quinic acid nutritionally supports the synthesis of tryptophan and nicotinamide in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and that this in turn leads to DNA repair enhancement and NF-kB inhibition via increased nicotinamide and tryptophan production.Moreover, it is shown that quinic acid is a normal constituent of our diet, capable of conversion to tryptophan and nicotinamide via the GI tract microflora, thus providing an in situ physiological source of these essential metabolic ingredients to humans. The concentrations of quinic and hippuric acids in the diet were dependent on each other when analysed in urine, as was evidenced by a significant linear regression analysis that included unsupplemented control subjects (n = 45, p < 0.001). Thus, these ingredients were identified as major dietary components, and not simply originating from environmental pollution as previously had been thought.
五十多年来,人们一直认为马尿酸/奎尼酸没有生物学功效。本文提供的数据支持以下假设:奎尼酸本身并无任何功效,而是在营养方面支持胃肠道(GI)中色氨酸和烟酰胺的合成,进而通过增加烟酰胺和色氨酸的生成导致DNA修复增强和NF-κB抑制。此外,研究表明奎尼酸是我们日常饮食中的正常成分,能够通过胃肠道微生物群转化为色氨酸和烟酰胺,从而为人类提供这些必需代谢成分的原位生理来源。当对尿液进行分析时,饮食中奎尼酸和马尿酸的浓度相互依赖,对未补充的对照受试者(n = 45,p < 0.001)进行的显著线性回归分析证明了这一点。因此,这些成分被确定为主要的饮食成分,而不是像以前认为的那样仅仅源于环境污染。