Boone Judith, Rinkes Inne Borel, van Leeuwen Maarten, van Hillegersberg Richard
Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Sep;78(9):784-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04650.x.
Water-soluble contrast swallow examination is routinely carried out after oesophagectomy to detect leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and clinical value.
Patients with oesophageal carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy with gastric conduit formation and a hand-sewn cervical anastomosis between 1989 and 2003 were reviewed on outcome of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination (RACSE) and appearance of clinical anastomotic leakage.
An RACSE was carried out in 207 (82%) of 252 patients on postoperative day 8 (range 3-15). In 45 patients, no RACSE was executed, mainly because of a prolonged stay in intensive care unit. In 18 (9%) of 207 cases, the RACSE could not be interpreted by the radiologist. In 19 (53%) of 36 patients who developed a clinical leakage, the leak had already manifested clinically before the routine contrast examination was planned. Taken together, the false-positive rate was 8%, the false-negative rate 48%, sensitivity 52%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 46% and negative predictive value 93%. No significant differences were found between the accuracy of RACSE in end-to-end or end-to-side cervical anastomoses.
Given the very low sensitivity and low positive predictive value and given the fact that in 53% of patients with a clinical leak, the leakage had appeared clinically before the contrast swallow examination was routinely planned, we propose to abandon the routine contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy to detect cervical anastomotic leakage. Alternatively, anastomotic integrity can be tested by drinking small amounts of water with simultaneous observation of the cervical wound.
食管癌切除术后常规进行水溶性造影剂吞咽检查,以检测颈段食管胃吻合口漏。本研究评估了其诊断准确性及临床价值。
回顾性分析1989年至2003年间行食管癌切除术并采用胃代食管术及手工缝合颈段吻合术的患者,观察其常规水溶性造影剂吞咽检查(RACSE)结果及临床吻合口漏的表现。
252例患者中有207例(82%)在术后第8天(范围3 - 15天)进行了RACSE。45例患者未进行RACSE,主要原因是在重症监护病房停留时间延长。207例中有18例(9%)的RACSE结果放射科医生无法解读。36例发生临床吻合口漏的患者中,有19例(53%)在计划进行常规造影检查之前临床漏出已表现出来。综合来看,假阳性率为8%,假阴性率为48%,敏感性为52%,特异性为92%,阳性预测值为46%,阴性预测值为93%。端端或端侧颈段吻合的RACSE准确性之间未发现显著差异。
鉴于敏感性极低和阳性预测值低,且53%的临床吻合口漏患者在常规造影吞咽检查计划之前临床漏出已出现,我们建议放弃食管癌切除术后检测颈段吻合口漏的常规造影吞咽检查。或者,可以通过让患者饮用少量水并同时观察颈部伤口来检测吻合口的完整性。