Iannettoni M D, Whyte R I, Orringer M B
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0344, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Nov;110(5):1493-500; discussion 1500-1. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70072-2.
Recent enthusiasm for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis has arisen because of its perceived low morbidity. Although catastrophic complications of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis are unusual, they can and do occur, and prevention is possible if the potential for them is recognized. Among 856 patients undergoing a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after transhiatal esophagectomy, catastrophic cervical infectious complications occurred in 11 patients (1.3%): vertebral body osteomyelitis (1), epidural abscess with neurologic impairment (2), pulmonary microabscesses from internal jugular vein abscess (1), tracheoesophagogastric anastomotic fistula (1), and major dehiscence necessitating anastomotic takedown (6). These complications became manifest from 5 to 85 days after the esophageal resection and reconstruction (mean 19 days). Leakage from a gastric suspension stitch placed in the anterior spinal ligament over the vertebral bodies resulted in a posterior gastric leak and either osteomyelitis or an epidural abscess in three patients, none of whom had evidence of extravasation on the routine barium swallow 10 days after operation. Cervical exploration for a presumed anastomotic leak led to the unexpected discovery of an abscess formed by the stomach and the adjacent wall of the internal jugular vein, which was ligated and resected. One patient without symptoms who was discharged from the hospital with a contained anastomotic leak on the postoperative barium swallow was readmitted 7 days later with a cervical tracheoesophagogastric anastomotic fistula of which he ultimately died. In 6 patients (7% of those who had anastomotic leaks) there was sufficient gastric ischemia or necrosis, or both, to necessitate takedown of the anastomosis and intrathoracic stomach, cervical esophagostomy, and insertion of a feeding tube. As a result of this experience, it is recommended that cervical gastric suspension sutures either be omitted entirely or placed in the fascia over the longus colli muscles anterior to the spine, but not directly into the prevertebral fascia overlying the vertebral bodies or cervical disks. All but minute cervical anastomotic leaks, even if apparently contained, are best drained rather than treated expectantly. Patients who remain febrile and ill after bedside drainage of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis leak should undergo cervical reexploration in the operating room; major gastric ischemia or necrosis, or both, may warrant takedown of the anastomosis and intrathoracic stomach.
近期,由于人们认为颈段食管胃吻合术的发病率较低,所以对其热情高涨。尽管颈段食管胃吻合术的灾难性并发症并不常见,但确实可能发生,而且如果认识到其潜在风险,预防是可行的。在856例行经裂孔食管切除术后进行颈段食管胃吻合术的患者中,11例(1.3%)发生了灾难性的颈部感染并发症:椎体骨髓炎(1例)、伴有神经功能障碍的硬膜外脓肿(2例)、颈内静脉脓肿导致的肺部微脓肿(1例)、气管食管胃吻合口瘘(1例)以及需要拆除吻合口的严重裂开(6例)。这些并发症在食管切除和重建后5至85天出现(平均19天)。置于椎体前方脊柱韧带的胃悬吊缝线渗漏导致胃后壁渗漏,3例患者发生骨髓炎或硬膜外脓肿,术后10天常规钡餐检查均无外渗迹象。因推测吻合口漏而进行的颈部探查意外发现胃与颈内静脉相邻壁形成脓肿,予以结扎并切除。1例术后钡餐检查显示吻合口漏局限但无症状出院的患者,7天后因颈部气管食管胃吻合口瘘再次入院,最终死亡。6例患者(占吻合口漏患者的7%)出现足够的胃缺血或坏死,或两者皆有,需要拆除吻合口和胸内胃、行颈部食管造口术并插入饲管。鉴于此经验,建议完全省略颈段胃悬吊缝线或将其置于脊柱前方颈长肌上方的筋膜中,而不要直接置于覆盖椎体或颈椎间盘的椎前筋膜中。除微小的颈段吻合口漏外,即使看似局限,最好也进行引流而非保守治疗。颈段食管胃吻合口漏床边引流后仍发热且病情不佳的患者应在手术室进行颈部再次探查;严重的胃缺血或坏死,或两者皆有,可能需要拆除吻合口和胸内胃。