O'Driscoll Gillian A, Callahan Brandy L
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Stewart Biological Sciences Building, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1.
Brain Cogn. 2008 Dec;68(3):359-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.023. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
Abnormal smooth pursuit eye-tracking is one of the most replicated deficits in the psychophysiological literature in schizophrenia [Levy, D. L., Holzman, P. S., Matthysse, S., & Mendell, N. R. (1993). Eye tracking dysfunction and schizophrenia: A critical perspective. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 19, 461-505]. We used meta-analytic procedures to quantify patient-control differences in eye-tracking and to evaluate potential moderators of effect size including patient and target characteristics and characteristics of the control population (matched or not). The magnitude of patient-control differences in pursuit depended on the measure. Global measures had large effect sizes. Among specific measures, maintenance gain and leading saccades yielded large effect sizes, with gain also yielding the narrowest confidence interval. Effect sizes associated with specific measures of smooth pursuit vs. specific measures of intrusive saccades did not clearly implicate one system over the other. Patient demographics and target characteristics generally had little influence on effect sizes. However, studies that failed to sex-match patients and controls tended to have smaller effect sizes for maintenance gain and catch-up saccade rate. Average effect sizes and confidence limits for global measures of pursuit and for maintenance gain place these measures alongside the very strongest neurocognitive measures in the literature [Heinrichs, R. W. (2004). Meta-analysis, and the science of schizophrenia: Variant evidence or evidence of variants? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 379-394] for distinguishing between patients with schizophrenia and controls.
异常的平稳跟踪眼球运动是精神分裂症心理生理学文献中最常被重复验证的缺陷之一[利维,D.L.,霍尔兹曼,P.S.,马蒂斯,S.,& 门德尔,N.R.(1993年)。眼球运动功能障碍与精神分裂症:批判性观点。《精神分裂症通报》,19,461 - 505]。我们采用荟萃分析程序来量化患者与对照在眼球运动方面的差异,并评估效应大小的潜在调节因素,包括患者和目标特征以及对照人群的特征(是否匹配)。患者与对照在跟踪方面的差异程度取决于测量方法。整体测量的效应大小较大。在具体测量中,维持增益和超前扫视产生的效应大小较大,增益的置信区间也最窄。与平稳跟踪的具体测量和侵入性扫视的具体测量相关的效应大小并未明确表明一个系统比另一个系统更有问题。患者的人口统计学特征和目标特征通常对效应大小影响不大。然而,未能对患者和对照进行性别匹配的研究,其维持增益和追赶扫视率的效应大小往往较小。平稳跟踪的整体测量以及维持增益的平均效应大小和置信区间,使这些测量与文献中最强的神经认知测量方法[海因里希斯,R.W.(2004年)。荟萃分析与精神分裂症科学:变异证据还是变异的证据?《神经科学与生物行为评论》,28,379 - 394]处于同一水平,用于区分精神分裂症患者和对照。