Erci Behice, Ozdemir Süreyya
Department of Public Health Nursing, School of Nursing, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Dec;12(5):464-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
This paper is a report of a study to adapt the treatment decision evaluation scale for Turkish patients with cancer and to evaluate its psychometric properties. In 2006 a convenience sample of 199 patients with cancer at a Turkish university hospital completed a structured questionnaire including demographic characteristics and the treatment decision evaluation scale for patients with cancer. Item analysis, principal component analysis, internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha, paired t-test and correlations were used to measure the psychometric properties of the items of the scale. In the assessment of construct validity, there were identified three factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 explained 43.3% of the total variance (Satisfaction-Uncertainty, Informed Choice and Decision Control). Factor analysis yielded that all of factor loadings were above 0.40 and factor loadings of the items ranged from 0.42 to 0.69 in the scales. Internal reliability coefficients of these three factors were found to be good, 0.74, 0.75 and 0.71, respectively. The present study provides evidence of the treatment decision evaluation scale's validity, reliability and acceptability in Turkish cancer patients. This scale should be further evaluated in different regions in Turkey and diverse populations. The scale has potential applications as it can be used both as a research or a regular treatment decision evaluation tool with clinical settings.
本文是一项关于改编土耳其癌症患者治疗决策评估量表并评估其心理测量特性的研究报告。2006年,土耳其一家大学医院的199名癌症患者组成的便利样本完成了一份结构化问卷,其中包括人口统计学特征和癌症患者治疗决策评估量表。采用项目分析、主成分分析、内部一致性信度、克朗巴哈系数、配对t检验和相关性分析来测量该量表项目的心理测量特性。在结构效度评估中,确定了三个特征值大于1的因子,它们解释了总方差的43.3%(满意度-不确定性、知情选择和决策控制)。因子分析结果显示,所有因子载荷均高于0.40,量表中各项目的因子载荷范围为0.42至0.69。这三个因子的内部信度系数分别为0.74、0.75和0.71,结果良好。本研究为治疗决策评估量表在土耳其癌症患者中的有效性、信度和可接受性提供了证据。该量表应在土耳其不同地区和不同人群中进一步评估。该量表具有潜在的应用价值,因为它既可以作为研究工具,也可以作为临床环境中常规治疗决策的评估工具。