Hell A K, Becker J C, Rühmann O, Lewinski G von, Lazovic D
Orthopädische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Göttingen.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Sep-Oct;146(5):624-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038477. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
Inter- and intraobserver reliability and learning curve using Graf's ultrasonographic hip examination were assessed.
189 participants of the basic, advanced and final courses on hip ultrasound using the Graf method (DEGUM) were asked to answer a questionnaire and to measure 34 normal and pathological sonographic hip examinations. Measurement differences and the learning curve during the different courses were evaluated.
There was a significant (p = 0.001) improvement of the average angle between the basic (6.74 degrees [+/- 1.46 degrees ]) and the advanced course (6.22 degrees [+/- 1.17 degrees ]). However, there were no better results in the final course and no additional improvement. Participants had higher variations when measuring the beta-angle than the alpha-angle. A significant improvement was seen if the participants performed a large number of hip ultrasounds between the courses. Higher measurement differences were seen in pathological hip ultrasounds and in ultrasonographic examinations of poorer quality.
During the educational courses on hip ultrasound using the Graf method, a high intra- and interobserver variability was seen. These findings were most prominent in measurement of the beta-angle, in pathological hip ultrasounds and in ultrasonographic hip examinations of poorer quality. The best results were achieved by participants who had performed a large number of examinations between courses. For the improvement of ultrasonographic measurements, a large number of self-performed examinations and a training in potential mistakes seem to be of great importance.
评估使用格拉夫超声髋关节检查法时观察者间和观察者内的可靠性以及学习曲线。
邀请189名参加格拉夫方法(DEGUM)髋关节超声基础、进阶和终末课程的学员回答一份问卷,并对34例正常和病理状态的髋关节超声检查进行测量。评估不同课程期间的测量差异和学习曲线。
基础课程(6.74度[±1.46度])和进阶课程(6.22度[±1.17度])之间平均角度有显著改善(p = 0.001)。然而,终末课程中没有更好的结果,也没有进一步的改善。参与者测量β角时的变异高于α角。如果参与者在课程之间进行大量髋关节超声检查,则会有显著改善。在病理性髋关节超声检查和质量较差的超声检查中,测量差异更大。
在使用格拉夫方法的髋关节超声教育课程中,观察者内和观察者间的变异性较高。这些发现在β角测量、病理性髋关节超声检查和质量较差的髋关节超声检查中最为突出。在课程之间进行大量检查的参与者取得了最佳结果。对于改善超声测量,大量自我进行的检查和对潜在错误的培训似乎非常重要。