Suppr超能文献

不同新生儿髋关节超声筛查分类的可重复性。

Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2010 Dec 24;10:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-98.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subjective parameters by three investigators with different levels of experience.

METHODS

In 207 consecutive newborns (101 boys; 106 girls) the following parameters were assessed: bony roof angle (α-angle) and cartilage roof angle (β-angle) according to Graf's basic standard method, "femoral head coverage" (FHC) as described by Terjesen, shape of the bony roof and position of the cartilaginous roof. Both hips were measured twice by each investigator with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer (SONOLINE G60S® ultrasound system, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany).

RESULTS

Mean kappa-coefficients for the subjective parameters shape of the bony roof (0.97) and position of the cartilaginous roof (1.0) demonstrated high intra-observer reproducibility. Best results were achieved for α-angle, followed by β-angle and finally FHC. With respect to limits of agreement, inter-observer reproducibility was calculated less precisely.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher measurement differences were evaluated more in objective scorings. Those variations were observed by every investigator irrespective of level of experience.

摘要

背景

超声髋关节检查已被广泛接受,成为诊断、筛查和治疗发育性髋关节发育不良的首选方法。本研究旨在检查三位经验水平不同的研究者使用两种客观髋关节形态分类和主观参数的一致性程度。

方法

在 207 例连续新生儿(101 例男孩;106 例女孩)中,评估了以下参数:根据 Graf 的基本标准方法评估骨性顶角度(α 角)和软骨顶角度(β 角)、Terjesen 描述的“股骨头覆盖”(FHC)、骨性顶的形状和软骨顶的位置。每个研究者使用 7.5MHz 线性探头(SONOLINE G60S®超声系统,西门子,德国埃朗根)对双侧髋关节进行两次测量。

结果

骨性顶形状(0.97)和软骨顶位置(1.0)的主观参数的平均 Kappa 系数显示出高度的观察者内可重复性。α 角的测量结果最佳,其次是 β 角,最后是 FHC。就一致性界限而言,观察者间的可重复性计算不够精确。

结论

在客观评分中,评估了更高的测量差异。这些差异是由每个观察者观察到的,无论其经验水平如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/3d8049b24fdd/1471-2431-10-98-1.jpg

相似文献

1
2
Does probe frequency influence diagnostic accuracy in newborn hip ultrasound?
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Jul;38(7):1116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.033. Epub 2012 May 12.
3
Comparing ultrasound measurements of neonatal hips using the methods of Graf and Terjesen.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):104-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16419.
4
Correlation of femoral head coverage and Graf alpha angle in infants being screened for developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Int Orthop. 2009 Jun;33(3):761-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0570-7. Epub 2008 May 21.
7
Ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in newborns.
J Pediatr Orthop. 1994 Sep-Oct;14(5):667-73. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199409000-00022.
8

引用本文的文献

2
"ICODE Hip US Calculator": a mobile phone aid for screening with Graf's sonographic technique.
J Ultrason. 2024 Dec 23;24(99):1-5. doi: 10.15557/jou.2024.0033. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Concentric Circles: A New Ultrasonographic Sign for the Diagnosis of Normal Infantile Hip Development.
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 15;10(1):168. doi: 10.3390/children10010168.
4
Progress in screening strategies for neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 26;9:995949. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995949. eCollection 2022.
5
Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided system for knee osteoarthritis assessment increases experienced orthopaedic surgeons' agreement rate and accuracy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):1053-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07220-y. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Four decades of developmental dysplastic hip screening according to Graf: What have we learned?
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 15;10:990806. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.990806. eCollection 2022.
9
Using Z-score to optimize population-specific DDH screening: a retrospective study in Hangzhou, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 12;22(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04216-6.
10
Paediatric hip ultrasound: uncertainties in examination and choice of treatment.
J Child Orthop. 2021 Feb 1;15(1):42-47. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200084.

本文引用的文献

3
[Inter- and intraobserver reliability in Graf's sonographic hip examination].
Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Sep-Oct;146(5):624-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038477. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
7
Comparing ultrasound measurements of neonatal hips using the methods of Graf and Terjesen.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):104-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16419.
8
Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Jan;90(1):F25-30. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.029496.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验