• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同新生儿髋关节超声筛查分类的可重复性。

Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2010 Dec 24;10:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-98.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-10-98
PMID:21184670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3022795/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subjective parameters by three investigators with different levels of experience.

METHODS

In 207 consecutive newborns (101 boys; 106 girls) the following parameters were assessed: bony roof angle (α-angle) and cartilage roof angle (β-angle) according to Graf's basic standard method, "femoral head coverage" (FHC) as described by Terjesen, shape of the bony roof and position of the cartilaginous roof. Both hips were measured twice by each investigator with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer (SONOLINE G60S® ultrasound system, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany).

RESULTS

Mean kappa-coefficients for the subjective parameters shape of the bony roof (0.97) and position of the cartilaginous roof (1.0) demonstrated high intra-observer reproducibility. Best results were achieved for α-angle, followed by β-angle and finally FHC. With respect to limits of agreement, inter-observer reproducibility was calculated less precisely.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher measurement differences were evaluated more in objective scorings. Those variations were observed by every investigator irrespective of level of experience.

摘要

背景

超声髋关节检查已被广泛接受,成为诊断、筛查和治疗发育性髋关节发育不良的首选方法。本研究旨在检查三位经验水平不同的研究者使用两种客观髋关节形态分类和主观参数的一致性程度。

方法

在 207 例连续新生儿(101 例男孩;106 例女孩)中,评估了以下参数:根据 Graf 的基本标准方法评估骨性顶角度(α 角)和软骨顶角度(β 角)、Terjesen 描述的“股骨头覆盖”(FHC)、骨性顶的形状和软骨顶的位置。每个研究者使用 7.5MHz 线性探头(SONOLINE G60S®超声系统,西门子,德国埃朗根)对双侧髋关节进行两次测量。

结果

骨性顶形状(0.97)和软骨顶位置(1.0)的主观参数的平均 Kappa 系数显示出高度的观察者内可重复性。α 角的测量结果最佳,其次是 β 角,最后是 FHC。就一致性界限而言,观察者间的可重复性计算不够精确。

结论

在客观评分中,评估了更高的测量差异。这些差异是由每个观察者观察到的,无论其经验水平如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/7fd9ab6f1686/1471-2431-10-98-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/3d8049b24fdd/1471-2431-10-98-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/b7636ca3e8b1/1471-2431-10-98-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/7fd9ab6f1686/1471-2431-10-98-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/3d8049b24fdd/1471-2431-10-98-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/b7636ca3e8b1/1471-2431-10-98-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab35/3022795/7fd9ab6f1686/1471-2431-10-98-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip.不同新生儿髋关节超声筛查分类的可重复性。
BMC Pediatr. 2010 Dec 24;10:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-98.
2
Does probe frequency influence diagnostic accuracy in newborn hip ultrasound?探头频率是否会影响新生儿髋关节超声检查的诊断准确性?
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Jul;38(7):1116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.033. Epub 2012 May 12.
3
Comparing ultrasound measurements of neonatal hips using the methods of Graf and Terjesen.使用格拉夫(Graf)和特尔耶森(Terjesen)方法比较新生儿髋关节的超声测量结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):104-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16419.
4
Correlation of femoral head coverage and Graf alpha angle in infants being screened for developmental dysplasia of the hip.对疑似发育性髋关节发育不良的婴儿进行股骨头覆盖率与Graf α角的相关性研究。
Int Orthop. 2009 Jun;33(3):761-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0570-7. Epub 2008 May 21.
5
Interobserver agreement and clinical disparity between the Graf method and femoral head coverage measurement in developmental dysplasia of the hip screening: A prospective observational study of 198 newborns.Graf 法与股骨头覆盖率测量在发育性髋关节发育不良筛查中的观察者间一致性和临床差异:198 例新生儿前瞻性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 18;100(24):e26291. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026291.
6
[Practical significance of sonographic type IIa of dysplastic hip joint according to Graf's classifications].[根据格拉夫分类法对发育性髋关节超声IIa型的实际意义]
Harefuah. 2004 Jun;143(6):404-7, 464, 463.
7
Ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in newborns.新生儿髋关节发育不良的超声筛查。
J Pediatr Orthop. 1994 Sep-Oct;14(5):667-73. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199409000-00022.
8
Sonographic image of the newborn hip with positive Ortolani's sign.新生儿髋关节超声图像,奥尔托拉尼征阳性。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jun(279):138-43.
9
Neonatal hip ultrasound: tangent to lateral roof angle correlates better with stability than alpha angle according to Graf or percentage femoral head coverage.新生儿髋关节超声:根据 Graf 或股骨头覆盖率百分比,与外侧顶角度相切优于 α 角与稳定性相关。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020 May;29(3):219-227. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000709.
10
Is experience alone sufficient to diagnose developmental dysplasia of the hip without the bony roof (alpha angle) and the cartilage roof (beta angle) measurements?: A diagnostic accuracy study.仅依靠经验而不测量骨性髋臼顶(α角)和软骨髋臼顶(β角)就足以诊断发育性髋关节发育不良吗?:一项诊断准确性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(14):e19677. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019677.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasonic measurement of acetabular alpha angle to evaluate developmental dysplasia of the hip: differences between AIUM guideline and European consensus.超声测量髋臼α角以评估发育性髋关节发育不良:美国超声医学学会(AIUM)指南与欧洲共识之间的差异
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 7;30(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02530-6.
2
"ICODE Hip US Calculator": a mobile phone aid for screening with Graf's sonographic technique.“ICODE髋关节超声计算器”:一款用于采用格拉夫超声技术进行筛查的手机辅助工具。
J Ultrason. 2024 Dec 23;24(99):1-5. doi: 10.15557/jou.2024.0033. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Concentric Circles: A New Ultrasonographic Sign for the Diagnosis of Normal Infantile Hip Development.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements.用于评估具有重复测量的方法比较研究中一致性的统计模型。
Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 16. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1107.
2
[Evaluation of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the Liberec region in 1984-2005].[1984 - 2005年利贝雷茨地区髋关节发育不良筛查评估]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Jun;76(3):218-24.
3
[Inter- and intraobserver reliability in Graf's sonographic hip examination].[格拉夫超声髋关节检查中的观察者间及观察者内可靠性]
同心圆:一种用于诊断正常婴儿髋关节发育的新超声征象。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 15;10(1):168. doi: 10.3390/children10010168.
4
Progress in screening strategies for neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip.新生儿发育性髋关节发育不良筛查策略的进展
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 26;9:995949. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995949. eCollection 2022.
5
Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided system for knee osteoarthritis assessment increases experienced orthopaedic surgeons' agreement rate and accuracy.基于人工智能的计算机辅助膝关节骨关节炎评估系统提高了经验丰富的骨科医生的一致性和准确性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):1053-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07220-y. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Four decades of developmental dysplastic hip screening according to Graf: What have we learned?根据格拉夫方法进行四十年发育性髋关节发育不良筛查:我们学到了什么?
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 15;10:990806. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.990806. eCollection 2022.
7
The incidence of avascular necrosis following a cohort of treated developmental dysplasia of the hip in a single tertiary centre.在单个三级医疗中心对一组接受治疗的发育性髋关节发育不良患者进行随访后,出现无血管性坏死的发生率。
J Child Orthop. 2021 Jun 1;15(3):232-240. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200246.
8
Prenatal Screening for Developmental Displacement of the Hip: The BUDDHA (Pre-Birth Ultrasound for Developmental Displacement of the Hip Assessment) Study.髋关节发育性移位的产前筛查:BUDDHA(用于髋关节发育性移位评估的产前超声检查)研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 12;11(5):868. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050868.
9
Using Z-score to optimize population-specific DDH screening: a retrospective study in Hangzhou, China.使用Z评分优化特定人群的发育性髋关节发育不良筛查:中国杭州的一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 12;22(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04216-6.
10
Paediatric hip ultrasound: uncertainties in examination and choice of treatment.小儿髋关节超声检查:检查及治疗选择中的不确定性
J Child Orthop. 2021 Feb 1;15(1):42-47. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200084.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Sep-Oct;146(5):624-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038477. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
4
Increased diagnostic information and understanding disease: uncertainty in the diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia.增加诊断信息与理解疾病:发育性髋关节发育不良诊断中的不确定性
Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):355-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2422051937.
5
Ultrasound in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. The European approach. A review of methods, accuracy and clinical validity.超声在新生儿髋关节发育不良诊断中的应用。欧洲方法。方法、准确性及临床有效性综述。
Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):1960-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0557-y. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
6
Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic literature review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.髋关节发育不良的筛查:美国预防服务工作组的系统文献综述
Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):e557-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1597.
7
Comparing ultrasound measurements of neonatal hips using the methods of Graf and Terjesen.使用格拉夫(Graf)和特尔耶森(Terjesen)方法比较新生儿髋关节的超声测量结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):104-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16419.
8
Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.超声筛查发育性髋关节发育不良的有效性。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Jan;90(1):F25-30. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.029496.
9
Inter-observer agreement of ultrasonographic measurement of alpha and beta angles and the final type classification based on the Graf method.基于格拉夫方法的α角和β角超声测量及最终类型分类的观察者间一致性。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2004 Nov 13;134(45-46):671-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2004.10764.
10
Comparable ultrasound measurements of ten anatomical specimens of infant hip joints by the methods of Graf and Terjesen.采用格拉夫(Graf)法和特尔耶森(Terjesen)法对十个婴儿髋关节解剖标本进行超声测量对比。
Acta Radiol. 2004 Apr;45(2):227-35. doi: 10.1080/02841850410003554.