Roovers E A, Boere-Boonekamp M M, Geertsma T S A, Zielhuis G A, Kerkhoff A H M
Centre for Health Care Research, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jul;85(5):726-30.
We studied the reproducibility of ultrasonographic screening examination of the hip when read by diagnostic radiographers. In order to determine interobserver variability, 200 ultrasonograms were classified according to Graf's method by five observers (four radiographers and one radiologist). The kappa values for interobserver variability indicated moderate agreement (kappa 0.47) for the exact Graf classification and substantial agreement (kappa 0.65) for the classification of normal (type I) versus abnormal (type IIa-IV). Agreement was significantly different for normal, immature and abnormal hips. Comparison of the findings in our interobserver study with existing information based on other examinations and treatment revealed that only a small number of infants with mildly dysplastic hips would have been typed as normal by some observers as a result of observer variability. In conclusion, the interobserver agreement on the ultrasound assessment of the hip was good enough for screening purposes. Observer variability did not result in any severe cases being missed.
我们研究了由诊断放射技师解读时髋关节超声筛查检查的可重复性。为了确定观察者间的变异性,由五名观察者(四名放射技师和一名放射科医生)根据格拉夫方法对200份超声图像进行分类。观察者间变异性的kappa值表明,对于精确的格拉夫分类,一致性为中等(kappa 0.47),对于正常(I型)与异常(IIa-IV型)的分类,一致性为高度(kappa 0.65)。正常、未成熟和异常髋关节的一致性存在显著差异。将我们观察者间研究的结果与基于其他检查和治疗的现有信息进行比较后发现,由于观察者变异性,一些观察者会将少数轻度发育不良的婴儿髋关节判定为正常。总之,观察者间对髋关节超声评估的一致性足以用于筛查目的。观察者变异性并未导致任何严重病例漏诊。