Barreto Simone dos Santos, Ortiz Karin Zazo
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Pro Fono. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):201-6. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872008000300011.
the reduction in speech intelligibility is considered one of the main characteristics of individuals with speech disorders, and is an important issue for clinical and research investigation. In spite of its relevance, the literature does not present a consensus on how to measure speech intelligibility. Besides the diversity of existent methods, another important issue refers to the influence of certain variables on these measurements and, consequently, on the interpretation of the results.
to investigate evidence on the agreement between speech intelligibility measurements, obtained through different methods, used in the assessment of speech disorders, and to identify the effect of variables related to assessment procedures or to the listener. A critical review of articles indexed in the databases Medline, Web of Science, Lilacs and Scielo, until October 2007, was carried out. The key-word used to perform the search was speech intelligibility.
there was no evidence of agreement between the speech intelligibility measurements obtained through different methods in the investigated literature. This fact limits the comparison between clinic and research results on speech intelligibility of individuals with speech disorders. Besides that, it was observed that some variables can interfere in these measurements, such as: type of task and speech stimulus, signal presentation mode, type of required answer and listener's experience with the speaker. These must be considered when interpreting the results of speech intelligibility tests.
言语清晰度降低被认为是言语障碍患者的主要特征之一,是临床和研究调查的重要问题。尽管其具有相关性,但文献中对于如何测量言语清晰度并未达成共识。除了现有方法的多样性外,另一个重要问题是某些变量对这些测量结果的影响,进而对结果的解释产生影响。
研究通过不同方法获得的用于评估言语障碍的言语清晰度测量结果之间一致性的证据,并确定与评估程序或听众相关的变量的影响。对截至2007年10月在Medline、Web of Science、Lilacs和Scielo数据库中索引的文章进行了批判性综述。用于搜索的关键词是言语清晰度。
在所研究的文献中,没有证据表明通过不同方法获得的言语清晰度测量结果之间存在一致性。这一事实限制了对言语障碍患者言语清晰度的临床和研究结果之间的比较。除此之外,还观察到一些变量会干扰这些测量,例如:任务和言语刺激的类型、信号呈现模式、所需答案的类型以及听众与说话者的经验。在解释言语清晰度测试结果时必须考虑这些因素。