Mason Helen, Jones-Lee Michael, Donaldson Cam
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Health Econ. 2009 Aug;18(8):933-50. doi: 10.1002/hec.1416.
Debate about the monetary value of a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) has existed in the health economics literature for some time. More recently, concern about such a value has arisen in UK health policy. This paper reports on an attempt to 'model' a willingness-to-pay-based value of a QALY from the existing value of preventing a statistical fatality (VPF) currently used in UK public sector decision making. Two methods of deriving the value of a QALY from the existing UK VPF are outlined: one conventional and one new. The advantages and disadvantages of each of the approaches are discussed as well as the implications of the results for policy and health economic evaluation methodology.
关于质量调整生命年(QALY)货币价值的争论在健康经济学文献中已存在一段时间。最近,英国的健康政策中也出现了对这种价值的担忧。本文报告了一项尝试,即根据英国公共部门决策中目前使用的预防统计性死亡(VPF)的现有价值,“模拟”基于支付意愿的QALY价值。概述了从英国现有的VPF得出QALY价值的两种方法:一种是传统方法,一种是新方法。讨论了每种方法的优缺点以及结果对政策和健康经济评估方法的影响。