改进跨部门比较：超越与健康相关的质量调整生命年
Improving Cross-Sector Comparisons: Going Beyond the Health-Related QALY.
作者信息
Brazier John, Tsuchiya Aki
机构信息
School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
出版信息
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Dec;13(6):557-65. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0194-1.
Abstract
The quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) has become a widely used measure of health outcomes for use in informing decision making in health technology assessment. However, there is growing recognition of outcomes beyond health within the health sector and in related sectors such as social care and public health. This paper presents the advantages and disadvantages of ten possible approaches covering extending the health-related QALY and using well-being and monetary-based methods, in order to address the problem of using multiple outcome measures to inform resource allocation within and between sectors.
摘要
质量调整生命年（QALY）已成为一种广泛使用的健康结果衡量指标，用于为卫生技术评估中的决策提供信息。然而，卫生部门以及社会护理和公共卫生等相关部门越来越认识到健康之外的结果。本文介绍了十种可能方法的优缺点，这些方法涵盖扩展与健康相关的QALY以及使用幸福感和基于货币的方法，以解决使用多种结果指标为部门内部和部门之间的资源分配提供信息的问题。
相似文献
1
Improving Cross-Sector Comparisons: Going Beyond the Health-Related QALY.改进跨部门比较：超越与健康相关的质量调整生命年
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Dec;13(6):557-65. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0194-1.
2
Modelling the monetary value of a QALY: a new approach based on UK data.对质量调整生命年的货币价值进行建模：一种基于英国数据的新方法。
Health Econ. 2009 Aug;18(8):933-50. doi: 10.1002/hec.1416.
3
Is subjective well-being a useful parameter for allocating resources among public interventions?主观幸福感是否是在公共干预措施之间分配资源的有用参数？
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(4):437-47. doi: 10.1023/A:1013814702029.
4
Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE.在估计 QALY 的货币价值方面，搜索者与调查者：为 NICE 解决一个棘手的困境。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Oct;6(4):435-47. doi: 10.1017/S1744133111000181. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
5
Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: the 'chained' approach.基于意愿支付法估计 QALY 价值：“链式”方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
Can we estimate the 'social' value of a QALY? Four core issues to resolve.我们能否估算一个质量调整生命年（QALY）的“社会”价值？需要解决的四个核心问题。
Health Policy. 2005 Sep 28;74(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.12.009. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
7
[Economic examination of the 2006/7 update of the Israeli national list of health services].[对以色列国家医疗服务清单2006/7年更新版本的经济审查]
Harefuah. 2008 Jun;147(6):488-92, 576.
8
Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.成人社会关怀结局：偏好加权测量的发展。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(16):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta16160.
9
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: implications for societal health care resource allocation.为质量调整生命年支付意愿：对社会医疗保健资源分配的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):667-77. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05282640.
10
Cost-effectiveness versus cost-utility analysis of interventions for cancer: does adjusting for health-related quality of life really matter?癌症干预措施的成本效益分析与成本效用分析：调整与健康相关的生活质量真的重要吗？
Value Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;7(1):70-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.71246.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Exploring subjective constructions of quality of life in patients, carers and the healthy general public: a Q-methodological study.探索患者、护理人员和健康普通公众对生活质量的主观建构：一项Q方法学研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04045-3.
2
Are Economic Evaluations of Task Shifting Too Narrow in Focus? A Rapid Review.任务转移的经济评估是否聚焦过窄？一项快速综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01507-x.
3
A framework for extending the health-related quality adjusted life year by combining instruments.一种通过整合工具来扩展与健康相关的质量调整生命年的框架。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 24;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02352-4.
4
A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making.一个用于量化动物疾病多部门负担以支持决策的框架。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jan 23;12:1476505. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1476505. eCollection 2025.
5
Can items derived from international literature be used in national quality of life instruments? A qualitative study conceptualising the EQ-HWB in China.国际文献中的项目能否用于国家生活质量工具？在中国概念化 EQ-HWB 的定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 5;8(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00767-z.
6
Health-related quality of life and subjective well-being among children aged 9-12 years in Shandong Province, China.中国山东省 9-12 岁儿童的健康相关生活质量和主观幸福感。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 May 31;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02258-7.
7
A Longer Life or a Quality Death? A Discrete Choice Experiment to Estimate the Relative Importance of Different Aspects of End-of-Life Care in the United Kingdom.长寿还是有尊严地离世？一项离散选择实验，用于评估英国临终关怀不同方面的相对重要性。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 May 15;9(1):23814683241252425. doi: 10.1177/23814683241252425. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
8
Content validity of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S in a sample of Italian patients, informal caregivers and members of the general public.EQ-HWB 和 EQ-HWB-S 在意大利患者、非专业照护者和普通公众样本中的内容效度。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 23;8(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00706-y.
9
Reimagining the relationship between economics and health- WHO 'Health for all' provisions.重新构想经济与健康之间的关系——世界卫生组织的“人人享有健康”条款。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Jan 23;22(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00512-9.
10
On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda.关于经济评估中的溢出效应：定义、映射综述和研究议程。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Sep;25(7):1239-1260. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.使用通用和特定疾病健康相关生活质量测量指标进行 NICE 决策制定：系统评价、统计建模和调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(9):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta18090.
2
Estimating QALY gains in applied studies: a review of cost-utility analyses published in 2010.应用研究中QALY增益的估计：对2010年发表的成本效用分析的综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Apr;32(4):367-75. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0136-z.
3
Scoring the Icecap-a capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff.对冰帽（一种能力评估工具）进行评分。英国普通人群费用估算。
Health Econ. 2015 Mar;24(3):258-69. doi: 10.1002/hec.3014. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
4
Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: the 'chained' approach.基于意愿支付法估计 QALY 价值：“链式”方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
5
Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.选择与分配：用于引出社会偏好的离散选择实验和恒定总和配对比较
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1227-40. doi: 10.1111/hex.12098. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
Sick but satisfied: the impact of life and health satisfaction on choice between health scenarios.生病但满意：生活和健康满意度对健康方案选择的影响。
J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;32(4):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.002.
7
Effect of adding a sleep dimension to the EQ-5D descriptive system: a "bolt-on" experiment.在EQ-5D描述系统中增加睡眠维度的效果：一项“附加”实验。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):42-53. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13480428. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
8
Common scale valuations across different preference-based measures: estimation using rank data.不同偏好测量量表的常见标度评估：使用等级数据进行估计。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Aug;33(6):839-52. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13475716. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
9
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.291 种疾病和伤害导致的伤残调整生命年（DALYs）在 21 个地区，1990-2010 年：全球疾病负担研究 2010 的系统分析。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
10
Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.评估疾病和损伤所致健康结果的共同价值观：用于 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的残疾权重测量研究。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2129-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8.
Zotero 插件