• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作组建议:老年医学评估与管理研究的目标标准

Working group recommendations: targeting criteria for geriatric evaluation and management research.

作者信息

Rubenstein L Z, Goodwin M, Hadley E, Patten S K, Rempusheski V F, Reuben D, Winograd C H

机构信息

Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Sepulveda, CA 91343.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):37S-41S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05932.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05932.x
PMID:1885876
Abstract

To maximize the cost effectiveness of geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) programs, criteria need to be established for selecting patients most likely to benefit. A working group was convened to define appropriate patient selection (targeting) criteria for each type of GEM program and to consider research questions for future targeting studies. The group outlined targeting criteria for the spectrum of GEM program types and locations. GEM program types included: inpatient GEM units; hospital geriatric consultation service; GEM programs in nursing homes; outpatient GEM programs for functionally impaired persons; and geriatric community outreach/screening programs for functionally independent elders. For each program type, the group outlined targeting criteria based on current literature and experience. Because research has not yet established the effectiveness of many of these patient targeting strategies, the group drafted a set of research questions, pertinent to targeting, that require attention: (1) For each identifiable population of elderly people, who are most likely to benefit from GEM? (2) How should these people best be identified/targeted? (3) What criteria should be used for targeting? (4) How and how often should population screening be performed to identify persons in need of GEM?

摘要

为了使老年评估与管理(GEM)项目的成本效益最大化,需要制定标准来挑选最有可能受益的患者。为此召集了一个工作组,以确定每种GEM项目合适的患者选择(目标定位)标准,并考虑未来目标定位研究的研究问题。该小组概述了各类GEM项目及地点的目标定位标准。GEM项目类型包括:住院GEM病房;医院老年咨询服务;养老院中的GEM项目;针对功能受损者的门诊GEM项目;以及针对功能独立老年人的老年社区外展/筛查项目。对于每种项目类型,该小组根据当前文献和经验概述了目标定位标准。由于许多这些患者目标定位策略的有效性尚未得到研究证实,该小组起草了一系列与目标定位相关且需要关注的研究问题:(1)对于每一类可识别的老年人群体,哪些人最有可能从GEM中受益?(2)如何才能最好地识别/定位这些人?(3)目标定位应采用哪些标准?(4)应如何以及多久进行一次人群筛查,以识别需要GEM的人?

相似文献

1
Working group recommendations: targeting criteria for geriatric evaluation and management research.工作组建议:老年医学评估与管理研究的目标标准
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):37S-41S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05932.x.
2
Research strategies for geriatric evaluation and management: conference summary and recommendations.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):53S-57S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05936.x.
3
Targeting strategies: an overview of criteria and outcomes.靶向策略:标准与结果概述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):25S-35S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05930.x.
4
Working group recommendations: methods for geriatric evaluation and management research.工作组建议:老年评估与管理研究方法
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):45S-47S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05934.x.
5
Geriatric evaluation and management: current status and future research directions.老年医学评估与管理:现状与未来研究方向
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):2S-7S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05926.x.
6
Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: overview of the evidence.老年评估与管理项目对既定结局的影响:证据概述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):8S-16S; discussion 17S-18S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05927.x.
7
What do we know about patient targeting in geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) programs?我们对老年评估与管理(GEM)项目中的患者定位了解多少?
Aging (Milano). 1996 Oct;8(5):297-310. doi: 10.1007/BF03339586.
8
Working group recommendations: research on content and efficacy of geriatric evaluation and management interventions.工作组建议:老年评估与管理干预措施的内容及效果研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):42S-44S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05933.x.
9
Working group recommendations: measuring outcomes of care in geriatric evaluation and management units.工作组建议:衡量老年评估与管理单元的护理结果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Sep;39(9 Pt 2):48S-52S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05935.x.
10
Targeting elders for geriatric evaluation and management: reliability, validity, and practicality of a questionnaire.
Aging (Milano). 1995 Jun;7(3):159-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03324307.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a clinical interview guide to Multidimensional needs assessment in Palliative care (MAP): A multicenter mixed-methods feasibility study.实施姑息治疗多维需求评估临床访谈指南(MAP):一项多中心混合方法可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0329354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329354. eCollection 2025.
2
Enablers and constraints influencing implementation of a novel, multi-site community-based frailty programme: perspectives of leaders and implementers.影响一项新型多地点社区衰弱项目实施的促进因素和制约因素:领导者和实施者的观点
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06164-5.
3
Application, knowledge and training needs regarding comprehensive geriatric assessment among geriatric practitioners in healthcare institutions: a cross-sectional study.
医疗机构老年病医生综合老年评估的应用、知识和培训需求:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04964-9.
4
The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the identification of different nutritional status in geriatric patients: a real-world, cross-sectional study.综合老年评估在老年患者不同营养状况识别中的作用:一项真实世界横断面研究。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jan 8;10:1166361. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1166361. eCollection 2023.
5
The relationship between Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment parameters and depression in elderly patients.老年患者综合老年评估参数与抑郁之间的关系。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jul 26;14:936024. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.936024. eCollection 2022.
6
The Perceived Risk of Hospitalization in Primary Health Care - The Importance of Multidimensional Assessment.初级卫生保健中住院的感知风险——多维评估的重要性。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 Mar 18;7:23337214211063030. doi: 10.1177/23337214211063030. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review.初级保健中的综合老年评估:系统评价。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb;32(2):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
Integrating oncogeriatric tools into the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: current state of the art and challenges for the future.将老年肿瘤学工具整合到慢性淋巴细胞白血病的管理中:当前技术水平与未来挑战。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2015 Jul;17(7):31. doi: 10.1007/s11912-015-0454-0.
9
Frailty in primary care: a review of its conceptualization and implications for practice.基层医疗中的衰弱问题:概念解析及其对实践的影响。
BMC Med. 2012 Jan 11;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-4.
10
Assessing quality of care of elderly patients using the ACOVE quality indicator set: a systematic review.使用 ACOVE 质量指标集评估老年患者的护理质量:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028631. Epub 2011 Dec 16.