Linden W
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Psychophysiology. 1991 Jan;28(1):91-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb03393.x.
Three studies tested the effects of the following design/protocol variations in mental arithmetic: 1) Order of task, 2) vocal versus written delivery of responses, 3) effects of different types of superimposed noise distractors, and 4) varying types of mental arithmetic challenges. All studies used the same basic protocol with 20-min adaptation, 5-min task, and 3-min recovery periods; dependent cardiovascular variables were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate; in Study 2 respiration rate and respiratory amplitude were also assessed. Findings showed that vocal delivery enhanced subjective distress, lowered performance, and enhanced diastolic blood pressure responses. Noise distraction augmented distress but did not affect task performance. Variable noise distraction augmented systolic blood pressure and heart rate responses but only when math equations were presented on a video screen. Autonomic response adaptation was apparent from first to second tasks but not thereafter. The built-in replications strengthened these findings.
三项研究测试了以下心算设计/方案变化的影响:1)任务顺序,2)口头与书面回答方式,3)不同类型叠加噪音干扰物的影响,以及4)不同类型的心算挑战。所有研究都采用相同的基本方案,包括20分钟的适应期、5分钟的任务期和3分钟的恢复期;相关的心血管变量为收缩压、舒张压和心率;在研究2中还评估了呼吸频率和呼吸幅度。研究结果表明,口头回答方式会增加主观痛苦,降低表现,并增强舒张压反应。噪音干扰会加剧痛苦,但不影响任务表现。可变噪音干扰会增强收缩压和心率反应,但仅当数学方程式在视频屏幕上呈现时才会如此。自主反应适应在第一个任务到第二个任务时很明显,但之后就不明显了。内置的重复实验强化了这些发现。