• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注心理测量学。估计结构效度。

Focus on psychometrics. Estimating construct validity.

作者信息

Goodwin L D, Goodwin W L

机构信息

Division of Educational Psychology and Special Education, School of Education, University of Colorado, Denver 80217-3364.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1991 Jun;14(3):235-43. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770140311.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770140311
PMID:1887104
Abstract

The meaning of construct validity and techniques for its estimation are discussed. Of particular interest is the appropriate role of factor analysis (and related techniques) in construct validation efforts. A comprehensive view of construct validity is encouraged, as well as a cautious interpretation of the construct validity evidence available for many existing instruments.

摘要

本文讨论了结构效度的含义及其评估技术。特别值得关注的是因素分析(及相关技术)在结构效度验证工作中的适当作用。我们鼓励对结构效度形成全面的认识,同时对许多现有工具可得的结构效度证据进行谨慎解读。

相似文献

1
Focus on psychometrics. Estimating construct validity.关注心理测量学。估计结构效度。
Res Nurs Health. 1991 Jun;14(3):235-43. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770140311.
2
Establishing the reliability and validity of a new instrument: pilot testing.建立新工具的信度和效度:预试验
J Post Anesth Nurs. 1993 Apr;8(2):124-7.
3
Why are reliability and validity important to neuroscience nurses?可靠性和有效性为何对神经科学护士很重要?
J Neurosci Nurs. 2008 Dec;40(6):369-70, 372. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200812000-00010.
4
A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.用于测试效度和信度的心理测量工具箱。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x.
5
[A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity].[因子分析在结构效度评估中的应用指南]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Oct;43(5):587-94. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587.
6
Lessons on measuring construct validity: a commentary on Delis, Jacobson, Bondi, Hamilton, And Salmon.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Sep;9(6):947-53. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703960140.
7
Determining adequate sample size.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(1):4. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.t01-4-04003.x.
8
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
9
Psychometric examination of instruments using aggregated data.使用汇总数据对工具进行心理测量学检验。
Res Nurs Health. 1992 Jun;15(3):237-40. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770150310.
10
Finding and evaluating potential research instruments.寻找和评估潜在的研究工具。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2003 Fall;13(4):207-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of socioeconomic status with the success of chat-based online counseling for children and youth: A latent change score modeling approach.社会经济地位与儿童和青少年基于聊天的在线咨询成功率之间的关联:一种潜在变化分数建模方法。
Internet Interv. 2024 Jun 14;37:100753. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100753. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Prospective Validation of the Decalogue, a Set of Doctor-Patient Communication Recommendations to Improve Patient Illness Experience and Mood States within a Hospital Cardiologic Ambulatory Setting.《Decalogue》的前瞻性验证,这是一套医生与患者沟通建议,旨在改善医院心内科门诊环境下患者的疾病体验和情绪状态。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2792131. doi: 10.1155/2017/2792131. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Measuring Neurobehavioral Functioning in People With Traumatic Brain Injury: Rasch Analysis of Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory.
测量创伤性脑损伤患者的神经行为功能:神经行为功能量表的拉施分析
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):E59-68. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000170.
4
Psychometric Properties of "Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences": Review and Meta-analyses.《“心理体验的社区评估”的心理测量特性:综述与荟萃分析》
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jan;42(1):34-44. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv088. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for general use in New Zealand: confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis.验证 WHOQOL-BREF 生活质量问卷在新西兰的普遍适用性:验证性因子分析和 Rasch 分析。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Aug;22(6):1451-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0265-9. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
6
Validity and reliability of a scale to measure genital body image.测量生殖器身体意象的量表的效度和信度。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2012;38(4):309-24. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.569639.
7
The visual analogue WOMAC 3.0 scale--internal validity and responsiveness of the VAS version.视觉模拟 WOMAC 3.0 量表——VAS 版本的内部有效性和反应性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Apr 30;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-80.