Farrington M, Winters S, Rubenstein D, Greatorex J, Whetstone R
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge.
J Clin Pathol. 1991 Aug;44(8):670-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.8.670.
Reverse passive haemagglutination, a novel microtitre based assay, was compared with the Streptex (Wellcome UK) latex slide agglutination kit for streptococcal grouping in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory. Three hundred and fifty two extracts from 349 consecutive primary isolation plates were assayed by both methods. Reverse passive haemagglutination gave identical grouping results for 98.0% of the 345 streptococci identified by Streptex, and the kappa coefficient of agreement between the methods for all 352 extracts tested was 0.973. Cross reactions with Listeria spp seen with Streptex were not found by reverse passive haemagglutination. In the reverse passive haemagglutination method 11 streptococci could be grouped on each 96-well plate and most reactions were stable for at least 30 minutes. Reverse passive haemagglutination is more rapid to perform than latex slide agglutination when many organisms are to be grouped, and the patterns of haemagglutination are easily recognised. If the method was taken into routine use in a diagnostic laboratory, the persistence of reverse passive haemagglutination reactions would enable grouping results to be checked for quality control purposes.
反向被动血凝试验是一种基于微量滴定的新型检测方法,在一家诊断微生物实验室中,将其与用于链球菌分组的Streptex(英国威康公司)乳胶玻片凝集试剂盒进行了比较。采用这两种方法对来自349个连续初次分离平板的352份提取物进行了检测。对于Streptex鉴定出的345株链球菌,反向被动血凝试验给出了98.0%的相同分组结果,并且在所有检测的352份提取物中,两种方法之间的kappa一致性系数为0.973。反向被动血凝试验未发现Streptex检测中出现的与李斯特菌属的交叉反应。在反向被动血凝试验方法中,每个96孔板可对11株链球菌进行分组,并且大多数反应至少在30分钟内保持稳定。当要对许多微生物进行分组时,反向被动血凝试验比乳胶玻片凝集试验操作更快,并且血凝模式易于识别。如果该方法在诊断实验室中常规使用,反向被动血凝试验反应的持续性将能够为质量控制目的而检查分组结果。