Suppr超能文献

链球菌的分组鉴定。三种快速凝集方法的评估。

Group identification of streptococci. Evaluation of three rapid agglutination methods.

作者信息

Burdash N M, West M E, Newell R T, Teti G

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Dec;76(6):819-22. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/76.6.819.

Abstract

The clinical need to rapidly and correctly differentiate beta-hemolytic streptococci into Lancefield groups has prompted the commercialization of rapid agglutination methods. Three serogrouping kits, Phadebact, Sero STAT, and Streptex, were compared with the classic precipitin technic. One hundred and fifty beta-hemolytic streptococci and 75 alpha-hemolytic streptococci isolated from clinical specimens were used. Phadebact grouped all beta-hemolytic strains correctly while Sero STAT and Streptex were 96.7% and 99.3% accurate, respectively. Phadebact and Streptex correctly identified all group D streptococci. Commercial agglutination reagents represent a simple and reliable method for grouping streptococci.

摘要

临床上需要快速、准确地将β溶血性链球菌分为兰斯菲尔德菌群,这促使了快速凝集方法的商业化。将三种血清分组试剂盒(Phadebact、Sero STAT和Streptex)与经典的沉淀素技术进行了比较。使用了从临床标本中分离出的150株β溶血性链球菌和75株α溶血性链球菌。Phadebact能正确地对所有β溶血性菌株进行分组,而Sero STAT和Streptex的准确率分别为96.7%和99.3%。Phadebact和Streptex能正确鉴定所有D群链球菌。商业凝集试剂是一种简单可靠的链球菌分组方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验