Bixler-Forell E, Martin W J, Moody M D
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;2(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90006-3.
The improved Streptex method for serogrouping streptococci incorporates a new extraction enzyme and a simplified procedure requiring no centrifugation. A total of 114 clinical isolates of beta-hemolytic streptococci were serogrouped from primary plates, isolation plates, and Todd-Hewitt broth cultures using this system. Results were compared to those of the heat extraction Lancefield precipitin method. An additional 33 stock culture isolates of related streptococcal species and 5 strains of Listeria were serogrouped to assess the specificity of the test. Agreement between the two methods was 82.5% with primary plates and 96.5% with both isolation plates and broth cultures. Four isolates from three different serogroups were nongroupable by the Lancefield method, but did agglutinate in specific Streptex antisera; therefore, the enzyme extraction procedure appeared more sensitive than the heat extraction method. Streptex accurately grouped five isolates of gamma-hemolytic group B streptococci, but failed to detect antigen in 33% of the group D streptococcal extracts tested. In addition, cross-reactions were observed with strains of alpha-hemolytic streptococci. Streptex produced fewer ambiguous results and required fewer repeat tests. When used with isolation plates or broth cultures, Streptex is both sensitive and specific for the grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci of groups A, B, C, F, and G.
改良的用于链球菌血清分组的Streptex方法采用了一种新型提取酶,并简化了操作程序,无需离心。使用该系统从原代平板、分离平板和托德-休伊特肉汤培养物中对总共114株β溶血性链球菌临床分离株进行了血清分组。将结果与热提取兰斯菲尔德沉淀法的结果进行了比较。另外对33株相关链球菌属的储备培养物分离株和5株李斯特菌进行了血清分组,以评估该试验的特异性。两种方法在原代平板上的一致性为82.5%,在分离平板和肉汤培养物上的一致性为96.5%。来自三个不同血清群的四株分离株用兰斯菲尔德方法无法分组,但在特定的Streptex抗血清中发生了凝集;因此,酶提取程序似乎比热提取方法更敏感。Streptex准确地对五株γ溶血性B组链球菌进行了分组,但在所测试的33%的D组链球菌提取物中未能检测到抗原。此外,还观察到与α溶血性链球菌菌株的交叉反应。Streptex产生的模糊结果较少,需要重复测试的次数也较少。当与分离平板或肉汤培养物一起使用时,Streptex对A、B、C、F和G组β溶血性链球菌的分组既敏感又特异。