Suppr超能文献

听诊无法区分气管导管是进入了食管还是气管。

Auscultation cannot distinguish esophageal from tracheal passage of tube.

作者信息

Mizutani A R, Ozaki G, Benumof J L, Scheller M S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego 92103.

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1991 Jul;7(3):232-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01619265.

Abstract

We quantitatively compared the acoustic characteristics of passage of an endotracheal tube into the trachea with those of passage into the esophagus by analyzing the loudness and frequency (90% spectral edge frequency) of the sounds when auscultated at the suprasternal notch. We found that there was a significant difference (P less than 0.01) in maximum loudness between esophageal and tracheal intubations (0.15 +/- 0.05 and 0.25 +/- 0.06 V, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the 90% spectral edge frequencies. We conclude that, without directly comparing the maximal acoustic amplitude of tracheal intubation with that of esophageal in each patient, one cannot distinguish between the two types of intubation by means of auscultation.

摘要

我们通过分析在胸骨上切迹听诊时声音的响度和频率(90%频谱边缘频率),定量比较了气管内导管插入气管与插入食管时的声学特征。我们发现,食管插管和气管插管之间的最大响度存在显著差异(P小于0.01)(分别为0.15±0.05和0.25±0.06V)。然而,90%频谱边缘频率之间没有显著差异。我们得出结论,在没有直接比较每位患者气管插管与食管插管的最大声学振幅的情况下,无法通过听诊区分这两种插管类型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验