Suppr超能文献

听诊无法区分气管导管是进入了食管还是气管。

Auscultation cannot distinguish esophageal from tracheal passage of tube.

作者信息

Mizutani A R, Ozaki G, Benumof J L, Scheller M S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego 92103.

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1991 Jul;7(3):232-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01619265.

Abstract

We quantitatively compared the acoustic characteristics of passage of an endotracheal tube into the trachea with those of passage into the esophagus by analyzing the loudness and frequency (90% spectral edge frequency) of the sounds when auscultated at the suprasternal notch. We found that there was a significant difference (P less than 0.01) in maximum loudness between esophageal and tracheal intubations (0.15 +/- 0.05 and 0.25 +/- 0.06 V, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the 90% spectral edge frequencies. We conclude that, without directly comparing the maximal acoustic amplitude of tracheal intubation with that of esophageal in each patient, one cannot distinguish between the two types of intubation by means of auscultation.

摘要

我们通过分析在胸骨上切迹听诊时声音的响度和频率(90%频谱边缘频率),定量比较了气管内导管插入气管与插入食管时的声学特征。我们发现,食管插管和气管插管之间的最大响度存在显著差异(P小于0.01)(分别为0.15±0.05和0.25±0.06V)。然而,90%频谱边缘频率之间没有显著差异。我们得出结论,在没有直接比较每位患者气管插管与食管插管的最大声学振幅的情况下,无法通过听诊区分这两种插管类型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验