• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用标准化患者通过五项基于表现的考试评估临床能力组成部分的可靠性和效率。

Reliability and efficiency of components of clinical competence assessed with five performance-based examinations using standardized patients.

作者信息

Colliver J A, Vu N V, Markwell S J, Verhulst S J

机构信息

Division of Statistics and Research Consulting, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield 62708.

出版信息

Med Educ. 1991 Jul;25(4):303-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00071.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00071.x
PMID:1890960
Abstract

The present study was conducted to provide in-depth information on the reliabilities of measures of the separate components of clinical competence (e.g. data collection, test interpretation, diagnosis, etc.) assessed by a performance-based examination consisting of standardized-patient cases administered to five classes of senior medical students at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. In general, the reliabilities of the competencies as they were actually measured on the examination (using the number of cases on which each competency was actually measured) were small, with 54% less than 0.30 and 75% less than 0.40. For generalizability coefficients pooled across the five classes and projected to a common number of k = 10 cases, two of the nine competencies had reliabilities in the 40s, a third was close to 0.40, and the remaining six were in the low 20s. The number of cases needed for the competencies to achieve the recommended reliability of 0.80 ranged from 45 to 170 cases, with six of the nine competencies requiring over 100 cases to reach the 0.80 level. The low reliabilities of these measures of the components of clinical competence raise serious questions about using the scores as indicators of student performance.

摘要

本研究旨在深入了解临床能力各独立组成部分(如数据收集、检查结果解读、诊断等)测量的可靠性,这些测量通过基于表现的考试进行,该考试由标准化病人案例组成,施测于南伊利诺伊大学医学院的五个班级的高年级医学生。总体而言,在考试中实际测量的能力(使用实际测量每个能力的案例数量)的可靠性较低,54%低于0.30,75%低于0.40。对于五个班级汇总并推算到共同的k = 10个案例数量的概化系数,九个能力中有两个的可靠性在40多,第三个接近0.40,其余六个在20多。各能力要达到推荐的0.80可靠性所需的案例数量从45到170个不等,九个能力中有六个需要超过100个案例才能达到0.80水平。临床能力这些组成部分测量的低可靠性引发了关于将分数用作学生表现指标的严重问题。

相似文献

1
Reliability and efficiency of components of clinical competence assessed with five performance-based examinations using standardized patients.使用标准化患者通过五项基于表现的考试评估临床能力组成部分的可靠性和效率。
Med Educ. 1991 Jul;25(4):303-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00071.x.
2
Station-length requirements for reliable performance-based examination scores.基于可靠性能的考试成绩所需的站长要求。
Acad Med. 1993 Mar;68(3):224-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199303000-00016.
3
Six years of comprehensive, clinical, performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.南伊利诺伊大学医学院利用标准化病人进行了为期六年的全面、基于临床和表现的评估。
Acad Med. 1992 Jan;67(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199201000-00009.
4
Direct, standardized assessment of clinical competence.临床能力的直接标准化评估。
Med Educ. 1987 Nov;21(6):482-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb01407.x.
5
Validating the standardized-patient assessment administered to medical students in the New York City Consortium.验证纽约市联盟对医学生进行的标准化患者评估。
Acad Med. 1997 Jul;72(7):619-26. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199707000-00014.
6
Faculty Evaluations Correlate Poorly with Medical Student Examination Performance in a Fourth-Year Emergency Medicine Clerkship.在四年级急诊医学实习中,教师评估与医学生考试成绩的相关性较差。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):850-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.09.018. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
7
Setting standards and defining quality of performance in the validation of a standardized-patient examination format.在标准化患者检查形式的验证中设定标准并定义性能质量。
Acad Med. 1997 Nov;72(11):1012-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199711000-00022.
8
Validity of simple approach to scoring and standard setting for standardized-patient cases in an examination of clinical competence.在临床能力考核中,标准化病人病例评分及标准设定简单方法的有效性。
Acad Med. 1996 Jan;71(1 Suppl):S84-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199601000-00051.
9
Variations in senior medical student diagnostic justification ability.医学生高年级学生诊断推理能力的差异。
Acad Med. 2014 May;89(5):790-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000215.
10
Is clinical competence perceived differently for student daily performance on the wards versus clerkship grading?对于学生在病房的日常表现与临床实习成绩,临床能力的认知是否有所不同?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):693-707. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9075-1. Epub 2007 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
An instrument for assessment of videotapes of general practitioners' performance.一种用于评估全科医生表现录像带的工具。
BMJ. 1993 Apr 17;306(6884):1043-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6884.1043.
2
Evaluation of a multicenter ethics objective structured clinical examination.一项多中心伦理客观结构化临床考试的评估
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Dec;9(12):690-2. doi: 10.1007/BF02599011.
3
Use of videotaped consultations in summative assessment of trainees in general practice.录像会诊在全科医学培训学员的总结性评估中的应用。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):137-41.