• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床能力的直接标准化评估。

Direct, standardized assessment of clinical competence.

作者信息

Williams R G, Barrows H S, Vu N V, Verhulst S J, Colliver J A, Marcy M, Steward D

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield 62708.

出版信息

Med Educ. 1987 Nov;21(6):482-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb01407.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb01407.x
PMID:3696021
Abstract

Doctor ratings of clerkship performance are often discounted as not accurately reflecting clinical competence. Such ratings are influenced by the following uncontrolled variables: case difficulty; differing rater focus and standards; lack of agreement on what constitutes acceptable performance; and collective patient care responsibility masks individual contributions. Standardized direct measures of clinical competence were developed to control these factors and allow direct comparisons of student performance. Students saw 18 patients representing frequently occurring and important patient problems. Student actions and decisions were recorded and subsequent responses to questions revealed knowledge of pathophysiology, basis for actions, use and interpretation of laboratory investigations, and management. Actions and responses were graded using a pre-set key. The examination covered 73% of designated clinical competencies. Examinations scores corresponded with independent measures of clinical competence. Reliability studies indicated that new cases can be substituted in subsequent years with confidence that scores will maintain similar meaning. Costs are +6.95 per student per case, which is modest considering the quality and quantity of information acquired. Methods described are practical for evaluation of clerks and residents and for licensing and specialty certification examinations.

摘要

医生对实习表现的评分常常被认为不能准确反映临床能力而受到轻视。此类评分受以下未受控制的变量影响:病例难度;评分者关注点和标准不同;对于什么构成可接受的表现缺乏共识;以及集体的患者护理责任掩盖了个人贡献。为控制这些因素并允许直接比较学生表现,开发了标准化的临床能力直接测评方法。学生接触了18名代表常见且重要患者问题的患者。记录学生的行为和决策,随后对问题的回答揭示了其病理生理学知识、行为依据、实验室检查的使用和解读以及管理能力。行为和回答使用预先设定的标准进行评分。该考试涵盖了73%指定的临床能力。考试分数与临床能力的独立测评结果相符。可靠性研究表明,后续年份可以自信地替换新病例,因为分数将保持相似的意义。每个学生每个病例的成本为6.95美元,考虑到所获取信息的质量和数量,这一成本较为适度。所描述的方法对于评估实习生和住院医师以及执照和专业认证考试是切实可行的。

相似文献

1
Direct, standardized assessment of clinical competence.临床能力的直接标准化评估。
Med Educ. 1987 Nov;21(6):482-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb01407.x.
2
The Surgical Clerkship and Medical Student Performance in a Standardized Patient Case of Acute Cholecystitis.在急性胆囊炎标准化病人病例中的外科实习及医学生表现
J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):1045-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Reliability and efficiency of components of clinical competence assessed with five performance-based examinations using standardized patients.使用标准化患者通过五项基于表现的考试评估临床能力组成部分的可靠性和效率。
Med Educ. 1991 Jul;25(4):303-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00071.x.
4
Six years of comprehensive, clinical, performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.南伊利诺伊大学医学院利用标准化病人进行了为期六年的全面、基于临床和表现的评估。
Acad Med. 1992 Jan;67(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199201000-00009.
5
Correlation of the National Emergency Medicine M4 Clerkship Examination with USMLE Examination Performance.国家急诊医学M4临床实习考试与美国医师执照考试成绩的相关性。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1159-65. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.25496. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
6
Faculty Evaluations Correlate Poorly with Medical Student Examination Performance in a Fourth-Year Emergency Medicine Clerkship.在四年级急诊医学实习中,教师评估与医学生考试成绩的相关性较差。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):850-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.09.018. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
7
Surgery Clerkship Evaluations Are Insufficient for Clinical Skills Appraisal: The Value of a Medical Student Surgical Objective Structured Clinical Examination.外科实习评估不足以用于临床技能评估:医学生外科客观结构化临床考试的价值
J Surg Educ. 2017 Mar-Apr;74(2):286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Faculty and resident evaluations of medical students on a surgery clerkship correlate poorly with standardized exam scores.外科学实习中教师和住院医师对医学生的评估与标准化考试成绩相关性较差。
Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
9
A clinical clerkship collaborative program in Taiwan: Acquiring core clinical competencies through patient care responsibility.台湾的一项临床实习合作项目:通过承担患者护理责任来获取核心临床能力。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Jun;115(6):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
Validity of faculty and resident global assessment of medical students' clinical knowledge during their pediatrics clerkship.教师和住院医师对医学生儿科学实习期间临床知识的全球评估的有效性。
Acad Pediatr. 2012 Mar-Apr;12(2):138-41. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
ASPIRE-ing to Excellence at SIUSOM.在南伊利诺伊大学医学院追求卓越。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 May 5;6:82. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000082. eCollection 2017.
2
Machine Scoring of Medical Students' Written Clinical Reasoning: Initial Validity Evidence.机器评分在医学生临床推理写作中的应用:初步有效性证据。
Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7):1026-1035. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004010.
3
The Standardized Professional Encounter: A New Model to Assess Professionalism and Communication Skills.标准化专业问诊:一种评估专业素养和沟通技巧的新模式。
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Jun;7(2):230-3. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00275.1.
4
Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations.标准化患者的描绘准确性:在四项高风险考试中进行的 OSCE 站的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 May 19;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-97.
5
Temporal stability of objective structured clinical exams: a longitudinal study employing item response theory.客观结构化临床考试的时间稳定性:采用项目反应理论的纵向研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Dec 7;12:121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-121.
6
The use of standardized patients for mock oral board exams in neurology: a pilot study.标准化患者在神经病学模拟口试中的应用:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Apr 25;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-22.
7
Assessment of competence.能力评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Oct;46(411):619-22.
8
Evaluating internists' clinical competence.
J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Mar-Apr;4(2):139-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02602356.
9
Assessing clinical competence.评估临床能力。
BMJ. 1989 Jan 7;298(6665):4-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6665.4.