Halvari H
Achievement Motivation International, Oslo.
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Jun;72(3 Pt 1):707-41. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.3.707.
128 male high school students were tested for achievement motives, future-time orientation and perceived intrinsic instrumentality, and answered several questions related to future goals or tests at different distances in time. Success-oriented individuals and individuals with high future-time orientation perceived the goals as closer, planned to initiate preparations for the goals earlier, and planned to devote more time in the preparation than failure-oriented individuals and those with low future-time orientation. Interactions of motives and future-time orientation on the perception of goal proximity and planned time of initiating goal preparations did also emerge. Motives and future-time orientation affected the dependent variables most when the goals were at some distance in time (i.e., 1 yr. and 3 mo.), and the effects were minimized for the goal relatively close in time (i.e., 1 wk.). Individuals with high instrumentality report that they would start preparations earlier, devote more time to all goal preparations, and perceive more worry for the goal closest in time than individuals with low instrumentality. In addition, interactions of motives and instrumentality and of future-time orientation and instrumentality are presented. The results are interpreted and discussed in relation to the dynamics of action theory of Atkinson and Birch and other theories of achievement motivation.
对128名男性高中生进行了成就动机、未来时间取向和感知内在工具性的测试,并回答了与不同时间距离的未来目标或测试相关的几个问题。以成功为导向的个体和具有高未来时间取向的个体认为目标更近,计划更早开始为目标做准备,并且计划在准备过程中比以失败为导向的个体和具有低未来时间取向的个体投入更多时间。动机和未来时间取向在目标接近度感知和计划开始目标准备时间方面的相互作用也确实出现了。当目标在时间上有一定距离(即1年和3个月)时,动机和未来时间取向对因变量的影响最大,而对于时间上相对较近的目标(即1周),影响最小。具有高工具性的个体报告说,他们会更早开始准备,在所有目标准备上投入更多时间,并且比具有低工具性的个体对时间上最接近的目标感到更多担忧。此外,还呈现了动机与工具性以及未来时间取向与工具性的相互作用。根据阿特金森和伯奇的行动理论动态以及其他成就动机理论对结果进行了解释和讨论。