Goebel Simone, Fischer Regina, Ferstl Roman, Mehdorn Hubertus Maximilian
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Schittenhelmstr. 10, Kiel D-24105, Germany.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;23(4):675-90. doi: 10.1080/13854040802389185. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
The Five-point Test (Regard, Strauss, & Knapp, 1982) was introduced for the measurement of figural fluency as part of the examination of executive functions. Until now, no differentiated norms exist. We present normative data for adults aged 18-80 (n = 280) for the number of unique designs (productivity), the percent of perseverations (flexibility), the percent of rotated (strategic) designs, and the number of rule breakings. As age and education were correlated with test performance, norms were stratified by these two variables. Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability were calculated. Moreover, convergent and divergent validity as well as factorial validity were assessed through intercorrelations and correlations with other neuropsychological tests. All together, the Five-point Test proved to be reliable and valid.
五点测试（Regard、Strauss和Knapp，1982年）被引入用于测量图形流畅性，作为执行功能检查的一部分。到目前为止，还没有差异化的常模。我们给出了18至80岁成年人（n = 280）的常模数据，包括独特设计的数量（生产力）、重复（灵活性）的百分比、旋转（策略性）设计的百分比以及违反规则的数量。由于年龄和教育程度与测试表现相关，常模按这两个变量进行了分层。计算了重测信度和评分者间信度。此外，通过相互关联以及与其他神经心理学测试的相关性评估了聚合效度、区分效度和因素效度。总体而言，五点测试被证明是可靠且有效的。
